it sounds inspirational motivational smt like that.
Even at 32, I've never been able to observe that I could consider a girl/woman as someone who does deserve me. I'm feel more proud of this than desirous of condescending; yet I continue to think on it more and more whenever I'm not concentrating on one of my theoretical research problems. Am I wrong anywhere? Any suggestions/recommendations/prescriptions???
-
@NathanOnFire said
@vnair4u you refuse to provide your ID
Are you trying to say that something very wise, which will clear all confusions if it gets spoken at a forum of world-class intellectuals by someone of the likes of Einstein or Newton or Gauss or Hilbert, is supposed to get transformed into something invalid at the moment when this same very wise thing is spoken by an ordinary average mind at a forum of ordinary physics professors or internet surfing weirdos who look or woof with equal respect at both the wise stuff and the misleading stuff?
Or are you expecting that an Einstein-level scientist will “provide his ID” at web pages where relationship-related things are discussed?
Any philosophical assertion gets accredited as valid or invalid by means of discourses; and not on the basis of IDs.
-
@Donald-Huebner said in Even at 32, I've never been able to observe that I could consider a girl/woman as someone who does deserve me. I'm feel more proud of this than desirous of condescending; yet I continue to think on it more and more whenever I'm not concentrating on one of my theoretical research problems. Am I wrong anywhere? Any suggestions/recommendations/prescriptions???:
@NathanOnFire said
@vnair4u you refuse to provide your ID
Are you trying to say that something very wise, which will clear all confusions if it gets spoken at a forum of world-class intellectuals by someone of the likes of Einstein or Newton or Gauss or Hilbert, is supposed to get transformed into something invalid at the moment when this same very wise thing is spoken by an ordinary average mind at a forum of ordinary physics professors or internet surfing weirdos who look or woof with equal respect at both the wise stuff and the misleading stuff?
Or are you expecting that an Einstein-level scientist will “provide his ID” at web pages where relationship-related things are discussed?
Any philosophical assertion gets accredited as valid or invalid by means of discourses; and not on the basis of IDs.
I agree with @NathanOnFire, in a sense, that you are claiming to be Einstein level and cannot expect to be simply believed.
But I agree with you, that an ID certainly is the wrong way to go. People should be judged by what they say and do, not by their name, their appearance, their skin color (including white people of course) or any group membership. Or their wealth for that matter.
-
@Donald-Huebner said in Even at 32, I've never been able to observe that I could consider a girl/woman as someone who does deserve me. I'm feel more proud of this than desirous of condescending; yet I continue to think on it more and more whenever I'm not concentrating on one of my theoretical research problems. Am I wrong anywhere? Any suggestions/recommendations/prescriptions???:
As far are the slaughtering of animals is concerned, humans on Earth are already divided in three categories. Those with animal-like lives, those with slave-like lives and those with human-like lives. To understand this sentence of mine better than even I myself can explain, anyone may watch the movie Blood Diamond.
We are certainly in agreement that the world could and should be a much better place.
@pe7erpark3r said
I feel fear in your words...
What I feel is that you pe7erpark3r, you feel your fear at the places where vnair plays his games time and again,
and you play your games and do your works time and again, at the “destinations” - public or personal - that don’t deserve vnair’ presence,
and your strengths and abilities don’t deserve any sight of the “destinations” - public or personal - where vnair fights his battles.I suppose my answer was a little short for vnair to be taken as a thing to seriously consider and look for the deeper meaning in it...
The use of the word fear by pe7erpark3r was really insane and aggravating.
The use of the word insane might also be considered insane and aggravating :yum:. Especially since fear is part of the human condition, while insanity is a disorder. I however chose not to be aggravated or offended, for I know that thinking is offensive, if it is to be called thinking at all. And then this might in a sense be a cultural conflict, for beang called "fearful" might mean something very different for a european than for an indian, and I have not grasped much of indian culture so far, so I apologize for that.
What I was talking about is a human reality: Fear is real, we all feel it. In fact those of us who don't feel it, show signs of a mental disorder. And I was not hinting at a fearful conduct of business, which is not something deducible from vnair's words. I was talking about a deep existential Angst so to speak. And I do share this Angst with him, however I'm on the way of freedom from it more and more, which certainly increases my life's quality and the quality of my decisions too. Wisdom is a tricky thing.
-
You know, you might profit from getting to know this guy. He has a brilliant way of formulating the struggle of life:
-
Since Mr. Gates was mentioned, I want to pronounce my agreement with him about what he does for his son. Did you know that when he dies all his wealth goes to charity? His son "only" get's 10 million. He wants his son, to make his own life, to become a strong individual, who doesn't live of his father's pockets.
So yes, I do agree with this thinking. Let me draw up an image for you: Imagine two beautiful women, who have all the characteristics you would desire in your partner. Now both are thrown into poverty by life. It happens, revolutions do tend to happen every 100 years, and in every revolution, the truly rich loose almost all their wealth. In fact I've once met the Baroness in whose palace Putin lives today. She lives in exile and her daughter has an absolutely normal job. So take these two beautiful women from before. And tell me which one would you admire more: The one who falls apart in front of now being unable to live her former lifestyle, or the one who does not loose her smile or her aura? True strength shines in poverty, even brighter than before. While the true materialist might even kill herself. How would you answer the question: what would I do if I lost all my wealth and my ability to achieve (maybe through a stroke, a fire in the house, or a car crash...)?
As I said before, true thinking is offensive, it challenges you. Of course I do not have all the answers to all the problems. But as you can see I have the courage of challenging you. And I do not regret doing this, for I know, that a true man, will grow from a challenge. I've presented you some very deep ideas and I can only hope you won't just push them away, but actually grapple with them. But that's obviously your choice.
-
@Donald-Huebner No, I don't want his ID. I just don't understand why the OP needs to include all this stuff about him being a theoretical physics mastermind.
How is it relevant to the topic? He made this topic to complain about not having a girlfriend, not to tell us how he's the smartest man alive 😁 -
Now pe7erpark3r, now that you're having no words to defend your misleading incorrect remarks about vnair's original post, or to react to the very well-explained self-contained reply to your naive and misleading reply to vnair's original post, you've begun changing the topic of discussion and started telling lies.
-
Anyone who can write what vnair wrote, will expect to be simply believed. I understood his point. That's why I made so much effort on this site (it wasn't allowing me to react without registering).
-
If you're not able to simply comprehend what he wrote in such a great detail, you need to ask your doubts and not think about changing the topic.
-
You, as an instruction taker, tried to suggest naive incorrect things to an instruction maker, about fear. That was utterly ridiculous. He replied: "Who will you trust? Until when? God never appears in the world. Not even when a live lamb dies crying for help in the slaughterhouse. Humans are dominating this world. Who will you trust once you surpass the most powerful humans of your field?" You had no reply to this and you started changing the topic.
-
If you believe that your TLIG stuff makes you find trust in the world, it's only because you "always yield at the forefront". "You'd better wake up and realize that the birds who can fly have to hunt for grains. But the ones who can't fly are gifted a dream world where they get free grains. But why? And until when? The reason is that the chicken is ultimately slaughtered and all the investment is retrieved from the pocket of someone who doesn't yield to the guy who had been giving free grains to the chickens all their life. The chickens didn't even know where they all were to be taken in order to be slaughtered. Go teach your TLIG to alive babies of the chickens who've already been slaughtered."
-
If you never felt that you need to be far stronger than the degree to which one must be in order to be a man who can comprehend what the phrase "being responsible" means to vnair, it was only because you never were beyond the reach of the "forefront blockaders." Such a nice analogy vnair has drawn. The chickens who finally get slaughtered don't have to be wary of the true picture of how dangerous the times have become - both for the weak lives like you and for Almighty God whose "hands are tied".
-
An albatross, on the other hand, does think about reality. It thinks about the truth of the reality because it is beyond the reach of the humans who slaughter the chickens. It thinks about the truth of the reality because it doesn't "live inside an unreal dream world that may get shattered and destroyed as and when its Godfather lifts the curtain and opens it eyes"
-
Mr. vnair4u, it seems has deleted his words. I think he considered having written something prudent at a domain like this, to be a mistake. A domain that's too bad to not have the incorrect dubbed correct and vice versa.
-
I am rewriting what he had written. I was so enlightened by it and found it so eye opening that I registered on this site only to react to the imbeciles he was talking to.
-
@Donald-Huebner
hey, simmer down there pal. @pe7erpark3r tried his best to offer advice and help to vnair. -
vnair4u had written:
{
Nice naive remarks, full of ignorance and signs of having been created by someone who lives in a dream world that may get shattered and destroyed as and when this someone's Godfather lifts the curtain and opens his eyes. Have you ever thought about the fact that even these kinds of things occur in the world:- The editor of world's premier journal of physics says to a scientist that the paper that was supposed to present the scientist's theorem or theory to the world will be rejected because the world has not a single scientist who is ready to state that he or she is capable of reviewing the particular research paper. The editor apologizes and rejects the paper. The scientist now has to solve a political problem: to force the scientific community to begin to hold that this imbecile strategy cannot be accepted inside science. I find it pretty obvious why it cannot be accepted, but if you're in doubt you may urge me to explain in detail.
}
-
vnair4u then wrote:
{
- Do you have any idea of how buying and selling between private companies take place?? Of course, there is a well known peaceful manner in which everything is happily done in an online meeting or a meeting in person where the seller candidly sells and the buyer easily buys and the agreements are signed. But there's another scene. In this scene, a big fish (company Z) forces a small fish (company T) to sell itself off (to Z). Picture this. A person WeeNayhar runs a private company ALPHA. Company Z has been forcing ALPHA to sell itself off to Z for the past thirteen months but ALPHA isn't doing it. One night WeeNayhar is traveling on the road on the side of a riverbank in a cab belonging to a particular radio taxi company Y. Z has persuaded or forced Y to do what it does. The driver stops the cab. WeeNayhar loads his gun and dials Y's number. The people at Y say that they do not have any record of WeeNayhar traveling at that moment in one of its cabs. WeeNayhar puts the phone down and starts dialing the local police number. And the cell phone networks vanish, at least for him alone if not over an entire area in the neighborhood of the point on earth where WeeNayhar happens to be present at that time.
}
-
vnair4u then wrote:
{
- ... and so on and so forth ... Just lay low, try not to judge something that you've no idea about. You're the instruction takers and abiders. We are the instruction makers and challengers. You're sure lesser than the champions. We know we're greater than the champions but we are declared the challengers because the champions are blocking the forefront and violating all rules and ethics. You're the ones who always yield at the forefront. We're the ones who force the forefront blockaders. And if we fail to force, we still don't yield. For we know we're right and it's us who truly deserve to win. We fearlessly say: "to hell with you all!!!" It's us against the world, Okay! Don't try to vomit nonsense when you know nothing. You guys got no future. And that's why you all got no trouble. It's trouble and not fear. It's a great sense of responsibility and not fear.
}
-
vnair4u then wrote:
{
We're the guys who were raised by parents who told us all our life that we need not worry about anything. And that we don't need to do any job. For they had all that we'd ever need. We're the guys who were raised by parents who taught us that one must not give birth to a child if he or she is gonna tell his/her child that the child will have to find a job or create his own business when he/she grows up. We're the guys who were raised by parents who still tell us that we can marry anytime and our sons will never have to find a job or create their own businesses (out of compulsion, I mean.) But we are more responsible than our parents. We believe that one must not give birth to a child if he or she will be unable to assure his or her child that this child will never have to share a public destination like an airport or the road.
I know how much money I must have to be able to give that kind of assurance to my child. I wasn't born in the house of Mittal or Gates. So I have only three choices: become as rich as is needed, or never marry, or become irresponsible. The third one, I'll never do. That's why I said "I will remain single until I become very rich and get at least one private firm of mine listed in the stock exchange".
}
