@jacob55 said in What is your imagination about god?:
@thestrangest You were debating me? I thought we were sharing ideas? I'm not trying to be facetious, by the way.
At no point did I say you were wrong or that I was right, and vise versa. I didn't say, "I know 100% for sure that God exists"
Nah we were debating not exchanging ideas, i was making assertions not just remarks that were supported to be amusing or entertaining nomatter how much they were, there's this thing you do thats basically "you're right but i don't agree with you", where you tell me that you can't debunk or argue against the things in saying and then you continue to just repeat that nothing you believe in has changes but if what i say is right and you can't argue against it then the whole of what you believe would have changed. You're using faith, i have already established that faith is not a reliable pathway to truth
Yeah welp some things still flew over your head, the thing about how there's no reason to believe jesus ever existed, you know, this video:
I don't remember what you said but it was completely irrelevant and you were expecting me somehow to think it rendered a whole video which explains to the detail why Jesus having actually existed is ultra improbable to be a non-argument. It's like your brain is a sponge that you squeeze empty after every time i talk with you. It's pointless
you have been saying to us believers, "you have no proof and there is no proof, therefore God doesn't exist."
wrong and I've explained this before too, i have been saying "you have no proof and there is no proof, therefore therefore God doesn't exist God there's no good reason to believe god exists."
I have been saying
Belief, though it can be mislead, is defined as:
- an acceptance that a statement is true or that something exists.
Though you've never really said this before, K
Ok. Yeah sure let's say i accept that unicorns exist, how does that work? To accept something you'd have to already be not accepting of the necessarily evident fact that it exists, and for it to be evidently real there'd have to be proof, there we go, we're fucking back to proof again
- trust, faith, or confidence in someone or something.
No you DON'T have to have to have faith to belief in things if they're true. Didn't i explain this already along with why faith is useless? You even said that what I'm saying is ok or that you can't defend your position. You're just proving what i said earlier
You don't accept the existence of God. Why? Because peer reviewed scientists, smart men and women, have unequivocally proved life's process.
No, you can still have god even though that's true, but there's no proof of that, atheists have existed before science even existed, what's your point?
From the big bang theory through the theory of evolution.
Yeah atheists who existed before science didn't make up answers like "god did it" when these scientific theories weren't around
They didn't prove God exists.
Yeah that's true, if they did I'd believe he/she/it exists
I believe the big bang theory. I believe the theory of evolution. To the best of my knowledge I didn't once renounce them.
Cool, you're smarter than 99% of theists
Also, I'm not asking you to believe in God. It's not your desire nor your prerogative.
Cool
I respect that and won't ask you to pray to invisible sky daddy. Which ever one is out there.
Coooooooooool 👏👏👏👏👏
🖒👍
I come here to share ideas, not prove my prowess in intellectual debate. I'm not good at debating. I'm sure you have seen that.
I appreciate you and the detail you put into our discussions... debates, I guess. Haha.
You're welcome ig. Look, aslong as i have given arguments against sometimes you said then don't repeat it until you've debunked them because in a debate setting aslong as my arguments are standing strong then your claim is just unreasonable so there's no need to repeat it