@sumof1 said in Stop being gay - I will not put a longer title TWS:
@thestrangest holy shit you're actually retarded, once again you failed to answer what the post was asking for, and you not reading the previous comments is your fault.
You didn't say that they contained anything important i need to hear so it is your fault. Maybe they were just a constant repetition of the words "ASS" and "TITS"
Do you just start pasting your response whenever you see the words 'gay' and 'wrong'?
Bitch. What do you want, is there even a specific thing you want to know or are you just bashing gays for the sake of bashing gays. I don't get it
or do you actually look at the thread?
I read what you say and i add what i conclude is useful input, when a person asks for something they don't say half of what they are asking for 1st then the rest when someone responds
I don't want to know what nature you autistic feminist
Hmmm. "What nature you autistic feminist" what nature? What nature? Is it just me or does the structure of your sentence make no sense. Even more i am not autistic nor a feminist(as in feminazi but otherwise i support Ayaan Hirsi Ali and Malala Yousafzai type feminism) but i guess you're just using those as insults
You really are just copy pasting
To copy paste from YOURSELF instead of re-writing shit is not wrong. Why would it be?
you don't even use conscious thought
How does a person not use conscious thought in an argument, i don't think that's even possible
You just link to videos and articles how is that not letting google or the internet in general do your explaining for you?
BITCH, i can just hear the video and write what the guy is saying but that takes ages, i already know what Richard Dawkins says in the 1st video and that he reiterates a bit more in the second, you asked for an explanation on how homosexuality evolved to be included in the human genome and Richard Dawkins answered. Want me to summarise what he says in the video? Tell me, otherwise I'm not gonna waste my time copying word for word what he says because you don't want to watch a fucking video
unless ofcourse you're one of these scientists but based on what i've seen so far i doubt it.
if someone isn't a scientist and is talking about shit he's heard from scientists then it's just as good
And again there's countless grammar and spelling mistakes which automatically makes you less credible and makes me question whether i should even waste my time on you.
1st my sentences are clear enough for you to understand everything and my grammar doesn't make me a less credible source of information. How does that even make sense? That's just an ad-hominim
2nd Go ahead point out some errors, i don't think there are any which can't be explained by, 1st look at your keyboard(mine is a smart phone keyboard), then look at the out of place letter in the misspelled word, then see if the right letter is right beside it, yes it is so it was just a miss click. Or it can be auto correct, why is this shit important? This has nothing to do with the validity of my arguments
When you talk about debunking BITCH when the fuck bitch
I debunked the assertion that being gay is unnatural and bad by providing a valid argument
when the fuck did i ask you to debunk this shit?
Do you think i care if you ask or not? You don't think being gay is ok, which means i can provide arguments for why it's ok
and how the fuck do you debunk an opinion?
It being an opinion doesn't make it free from criticism. Some opinions are just wrong. Ex:"i believe that black is a colour" believe it or not that opinion is wrong
Is it so hard to get an actual response and not some copy pasted crap
You know that i could just have rewritten things i said before just as they are without copying them and that would change literally nothing. Lots of things being copy pasted from somewhere doesn't change anything, that's just called research.
and you say that you copy paste it from your previous arguments how the fuck does that even work?
Me-have debate
You-start new similar one
Me-recycle things i said in the last debate
are all these questions the same? You're just some dumb twat.
Yeah your questions are pretty basic and by the way even if i was a dumb twat(which I'm clearly not) that doesn't change the validity of any of my arguments, what you continue to provide are just textbook cases of ad-hominim and strawman fallacies