• @Anwar said in AND THERE COMES FINAL RESULTS.:

    @DarkIce you deserve

    THANKS FOR THE SUPPORT SAYS @DarkIce


  • @sup I guess my luck flipped or sth.....or anything...cuz I was so damn sure I'd get it this time :cry:


  • @DarkIce said in AND THERE COMES FINAL RESULTS.:

    @sup I guess my luck flipped or sth.....or anything...cuz I was so damn sure I'd get it this time :cry:

    😢😢😢😢 dont cry.

  • Global Veteran

    @ObviouslyLucifer said in AND THERE COMES FINAL RESULTS.:

    This discussion about unfairness in public ends now...

    any further queries will be dealt in my dms.

    :)

    It's only just begun.

    If you are going to make up rules and criteria, better stick to them.
    Once again you people have proven to be 2 faced incompetent leaders.
    I don't trust you in the first place so why would i trust YOU counting the votes LOL.

    Make it a poll, i don't mind seeing who voted for who, i don't mind having people see who i voted for.
    This whole past drama was about having the people chose their mods, and have transparency.

    An upvote counts just as much as a downvote, it's a clear sign of the people that they don't want this person to be a mod. don't just count the downvotes (which you portray as upvotes, nice way of making things complicated and confuse people btw)

    You are just kicking your users, the people who keep this website alive, in the nuts, once again.

    And why did you delete the results, afraid people would go check? deleting the evidence?
    I'm pretty sure that was your intention, after all the results from the previous elections (the one where zoey and cat were elected, are still up)

    Congratulations, no wonder theres more active users on discord than there are on TWS.

  • Global Veteran

    @Vampire_Queen said in AND THERE COMES FINAL RESULTS.:

    Guys stop arguing about it in public this is not the mature way to handle the situation. I retract my statement from earlier.

    Immature people who rig elections deserve an immature treatment. You made a very good and true comment there, don't retract it.


  • @TheRisingSun said in AND THERE COMES FINAL RESULTS.:

    If you are going to make up rules and criteria, better stick to them.

    TRUE.

    Make it a poll, i don't mind seeing who voted for who, i don't mind having people see who i voted for.
    This whole past drama was about having the people chose their mods, and have transparency.

    We could not make it as a poll because then there would have been fake accounts made in order to vote and that would have been really unfair.

    An upvote counts just as much as a downvote, it's a clear sign of the people that they don't want this person to be a mod. don't just count the downvotes

    To make things easier for us, we decided to only count the number of downvotes(ignoring the upvotes because most of them were made using fake accounts.)

    And in the first place, we didnt want any elections to happen because it creates drama and paves way for rebel (like us rebelling rn).

    YOU CANT CHOOSE YOUR POLICE WAS RIGHTLY PUT BY LUCIFER. BUT THEN TWS WOULD BECOME A DICTATORSHIP, NOT A DEMOCRACY.


  • @sup said in AND THERE COMES FINAL RESULTS.:

    We could not make it as a poll because then there would have been fake accounts made in order to vote and that would have been really unfair.

    And the way this vote was organised didn't allow for fake accounts?
    The way they did things now allowed for fake accounts AND the people won't be able to check it.

    In a regular poll, people won't make fake accounts i'm sure, they would be exposed pretty much immediately.
    Even if they were as stupid as to vote with a fake account, just discard freshly made accounts.

    It could have been so easy, but they choose to make it hard and complicated, it's the only way they can cheat.


  • @TheRisingSun said in AND THERE COMES FINAL RESULTS.:

    @sup said in AND THERE COMES FINAL RESULTS.:

    We could not make it as a poll because then there would have been fake accounts made in order to vote and that would have been really unfair.

    And the way this vote was organised didn't allow for fake accounts?
    The way they did things now allowed for fake accounts AND the people won't be able to check it.

    In a regular poll, people won't make fake accounts i'm sure, they would be exposed pretty much immediately.
    Even if they were as stupid as to vote with a fake account, just discard freshly made accounts.

    It could have been so easy, but they choose to make it hard and complicated, it's the only way they can cheat.

    We only considered verified accounts.
    Youre going off topic dude.


  • @ODIN Damn, I should have applied for the mod as well and make like 30 accs and downvote myself. Does that work? Just in case for next time?
    jk


  • @What-is-this said in AND THERE COMES FINAL RESULTS.:

    @ODIN Damn, I should have applied for the mod as well and make like 30 accs and downvote myself. Does that work? Just in case for next time?
    jk

    all the votes were legit.
    DONT WORRY ABOUT THAT.
    Theres other questions to be answered, for justice.
    @iservejustice help us.


  • Congratz who made it to the team and I wish a better luck.next time to those who didn't. I ain't gonna side with anyone is this argument as I didn't personally see the results right after the time of the election was over, but there are a few factors that I think it must be improved in order to avoid pointless drama next election.
    I think the election system works even tho is a bit flawed but even democracy IRL is flawed so we gotta find ways to improve it. Since I believe there is no way to check the time certain user upvoted or downvoted a certain post, the election post should be removed 24h or whatever time the election goes on for and when it's removed a screenshot should be taken this would prevent the "out of time" downvotes, also a screenshot should be taken as soon as the post is taken down. As for the non mod masses that are complaining you can take the same said screenshot so that you have proof on your side, as we all know mods admins and users are all human and not machines that can remove the topic exacly at the exact time.it should so that has to be taken in consideration.
    One last thing, I've been part of the drama before and believe it or not it didn't help AT ALL, so no point in causing it, better to find mechanisms to avoid drama rather then go on about things that might be obvious or not so obvious.
    Congratulations to the winners of the elections!


  • @Bela-Hella
    BELA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    tackles!!! gets up and dances with you YAAAAAAYYY!!!!!!!!!!!!
    GO BELA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! SAGOT!!!!!!!!!!


  • @Morf I will always be go Bela sagot lol..


  • @Bela-Hella Uhh sorry Bela and sorry everyone about that explosion of joy, I just couldn't hold it in this time, lol.


  • @Bela-Hella
    Got you a little present so your new colleagues can't stab you in the back.

    Good luck and take care!


  • @SightyDifferent said in AND THERE COMES FINAL RESULTS.:

    Downvoting @ODIN for posting a picture of Adyyan's upvoters and downvoters, also for saying that he has NO authority in deciding the rules of who gets what; without having any intention of expressing hatred or starting any sort of conflict, I have to say that this is pure hypocrisy. As for all of this, I'm pretty sure of one thing: you, those who keep complaining about the unfairness of how this worked, downvoted the ones you wanted to become moderators and upvoted the rest, without even knowing them. So, talking about being fair, do you belong to that category? Doubt so.
    For those wondering who @Adyyan is, he's been around for a long time, but inactive due to some personal issues. If you feel like someone deserved more than Adyyan did, that's your opinion and it's totally fine to express it, but don't attack the image of someone you don't even know.
    P.S: Damn you Adyyan, you brought me back to see this? Quite disappointed if I may say, let's hope I get to see more than... that.

    And who are you, you seem to know everyone here yet you joined only 23 hours ago? Another fake account to help make the tables turn?
    An upvote counts just as much as a downvote imo. You vote for the person you want, and against the person you don't want. The outcome is still a good representation of who the users on this website chose as their mods. Not taking into account fake/double/triple accounts like yours. If they didn't want this to happen they should have made it a regular poll but then again the result are alot harder to tamper with.


  • @TheRisingSun An old user. And I did not participate in voting for anyone, I have no interest in who becomes a mod and who doesn't (try asking a mod otherwise, since you're pretty active and popular, I doubt it would be hard to get the list of who voted).
    Also, argumentum ad hominem. If you are willing to depreciate a person, assure that your statements are valid and supported by arguments, otherwise it's a lost cause to even argue.
    As for the upvote part, you can do that, but that shows how low your standards are. Being against someone you don't even know and then complaining about how this election is "rigged" is just lame. For someone who has good grammar compared to the typical user here, I had quite higher expectations from you, at least when it came to keeping your mouth shut if you are wrong.


  • @TheRisingSun said in AND THERE COMES FINAL RESULTS.:

    @SightyDifferent said in AND THERE COMES FINAL RESULTS.:

    Downvoting @ODIN for posting a picture of Adyyan's upvoters and downvoters, also for saying that he has NO authority in deciding the rules of who gets what; without having any intention of expressing hatred or starting any sort of conflict, I have to say that this is pure hypocrisy. As for all of this, I'm pretty sure of one thing: you, those who keep complaining about the unfairness of how this worked, downvoted the ones you wanted to become moderators and upvoted the rest, without even knowing them. So, talking about being fair, do you belong to that category? Doubt so.
    For those wondering who @Adyyan is, he's been around for a long time, but inactive due to some personal issues. If you feel like someone deserved more than Adyyan did, that's your opinion and it's totally fine to express it, but don't attack the image of someone you don't even know.
    P.S: Damn you Adyyan, you brought me back to see this? Quite disappointed if I may say, let's hope I get to see more than... that.

    And who are you, you seem to know everyone here yet you joined only 23 hours ago? Another fake account to help make the tables turn?
    An upvote counts just as much as a downvote imo. You vote for the person you want, and against the person you don't want.

    You ever heard of an actual election before where people voted against those who they didn't wanna vote for? 🤔 And if upvotes were taken into account, anyone could make a ton of fake accounts and upvote the peeps they disliked, which mind you, someone did do.

    The outcome is still a good representation of who the users on this website chose as their mods. Not taking into account fake/double/triple accounts like yours. If they didn't want this to happen they should have made it a regular poll but then again the result are alot harder to tamper with.

    I think it was made pretty clear by now that we are already using the best system we could come up with, polls have been taken into account already


  • @SightyDifferent said in AND THERE COMES FINAL RESULTS.:

    @TheRisingSun An old user. And I did not participate in voting for anyone, I have no interest in who becomes a mod and who doesn't (try asking a mod otherwise, since you're pretty active and popular, I doubt it would be hard to get the list of who voted).
    Also, argumentum ad hominem. If you are willing to depreciate a person, assure that your statements are valid and supported by arguments, otherwise it's a lost cause to even argue.
    As for the upvote part, you can do that, but that shows how low your standards are. Being against someone you don't even know and then complaining about how this election is "rigged" is just lame. For someone who has good grammar compared to the typical user here, I had quite higher expectations from you, at least when it came to keeping your mouth shut if you are wrong.

    Our opinions differ, but that's ok.
    It's true i don't know Addyan, nobody does. I do know who HE knows though.
    I know Boots, he's another fanboy to the established order.
    If an upvote doesn't have to be supported by arguments, neither should a downvote.
    The way the voting was presented to us, allowed for this kind of voting and it's still a good representation of what the users want.
    For the record, i have absolutely no standards, at least not on tws.
    I'll leave it at this, so it doesn't get repetitive, makes me look like i got Alzheimers.
    kudos on the latin!

    Horum omnium fortissimi sunt Belgae :sunglasses:


  • @TheRisingSun I wasn't talking about upvoting, It's up to you how you vote and for whom you vote, it's your right. Re-read, it was meant to signify that your affirmations about me are not true since I did not vote and it's not a secondary account, but the only one I currently use. As for your standards statement, it is quite certain that you're the same everywhere.

    Semper fi.