No. Past is the past, and makes us who we are. The here and now is what matters.
@janet thinks that its a good idea to be a sheep and follow the laws blindly
-
@ssll-sg said in @janet thinks that its a good idea to be a sheep and follow the laws blindly:
welcome!!!!!!!!!!!
im glad youre here.
have a seat.make yourself comfortable.'I never said to follow laws blindly nor be a sheep. I said your opinion was irrelevant to me because it is a law that men take care of their children.'
i mean,you need to realize the incongruity here,right?
1)ive never said that you need to follow the law blindly
and at the same time,you said
2)the law said that men need to take care of their baby,so,just follow it.
when you said this,doesnt that mean that you wanted to follow the law regardless whether the law is perceived by others to be draconian and immoral?
Can you make up more stuff please. I need more of a laugh.
I never said this. This is a generalization. I said to follow the law that if you make a child you pay for it (or give up for adoption ofc)
-
so,janet,my friend.have you forgotten that you wrote this?
''In fact, the court looks at what is best for the child, and considers a child's best interest to be served when both parents provide financial support.
laws are laws so your opinion is irrelevant''LAWS ARE LAWS,SO,YOUR OPINION IS IRRELEVANT!
how else should someone interpret it as anything but
FOLLOW THE LAW,YOU SHEEP!YOUR OPINION MEANS NOTHING.DONT QUESTION THE LAW.DONT CRITICIZE THE LAW.FOLLOW IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
why cant you just admit it,buddy?
-
@ssll-sg said in @janet thinks that its a good idea to be a sheep and follow the laws blindly:
LAWS ARE LAWS,SO,YOUR OPINION IS IRRELEVANT!
Child protection laws not LAWS IN GENERAL. Stop trying to put words into my mouth.
Sorry if your brain is so fucking huge that you cant stay on one simple topic and you have to think of every law that's out there.
-
@Janet said in @janet thinks that its a good idea to be a sheep and follow the laws blindly:
Child protection laws not LAWS IN GENERAL
wait!
what??
now,youre saying that child protection laws are not law?
huh???????????????????
what are you trying to say here,@Janet ? -
@ssll-sg were you an example of your argument?
-
okay I've seen posts getting shit but holy shit tho...
(Contributes his token of appreciation)
-
@YourMomToo said in @janet thinks that its a good idea to be a sheep and follow the laws blindly:
were you an example of your argument?
i dont get what youre trying to say here.
my argument is not to follow the laws,any laws like a sheep without using common sense.what does that has anything to do with me?
-
@Its-the-Sleepy
there are 10 @Janet goons that has downvoted me in 60 minutes.
im blushing with all these attentions,you know?
LOL!
-
@ssll-sg what I mean was, did your mommy did the same thing according to the laws and asking your daddy to pay her a life time mcnugget vouchers when daddy left her? it was a lot of money tho. daddy paying big bang boom time.
-
nope.still have a mom and dad and theyre still together.
so,any other question you wanted to ask,boy? -
@ssll-sg are you sure that they're still together? parents tend to hide their affair behind their children.
-
yep.
so,anything else you wanted to ask,boy? -
@ssll-sg you upset?
-
why would i be upset,boy?
you asked a question,and i answered it.
i wouldnt be answering in a cordial manner if im upset,right,mboy? -
@ssll-sg I know you are upset, you're explaining yourself.
-
oh no!
you seemed to know more about me even though youve never met me.
did you possess some kind of supernatural power,boy?LOL!
-
@ssll-sg most people would know that you're upset just like an aunt or uncle from Singapore.
-
This post is deleted! -
and how do they know that im upset,boy?
-
@ssll-sg unless you are a lecturer or professor, you don't have to explain yourself when you're upset.