@Jesutomisin-Olu-Omotayo There's an abundance of online courses we can finish in hours. We can really take anything we want, or simply browse through, there's thousands that are free. We can learn higher math, calculus, learn to dance, learn gardening, do basically anything.. That's what I do when I'm bored. Learning new things.
Ask me stupid questions.
-
@jessicka oh my god... so much speculation... Can it be close ? Does it have to be a completely original name ? Do I get to decide ? Can I just SWITCH MY LANGUAGE & get away with not calling it exactly that ? If everyone MAGICALLY forgot that term instantaneously they might goooo for something clueless like "the jar of the tan stuff that goes with jelly" for a little bit. Maybe "goober spread" otherwise O.O
-
OR "if peanut butter wasn't called peanut butter, it wasn't called at all"
It depends on the context -
@Allison If air is invisible to humans, is water invisible to fish and other sea creatures? :thinking:
-
Why do we exist?
-
@Lazz Water will become visible to a fish that's thrown on dry land. Water has a form whereas air does not. As far as practical concerns go, it is ignored underwater and as such can be "invisible"
-
@Allison Your wisdom knows no bounds, Oh, Wise Oracle. :pray:
-
That depends on what "we" are. We is clearly a generalized term that represents nothing peculiar to one individual as opposed to another and so the question has to be brought back to a universal human standard.
With "we" being relating to persons, you can go with Descartes's "I think therefore I am" which is true among humanity. The "we" that is considered ourselves exists through thought and self-reflection.
Somehow for the sake of this forum, it's a "stupid question" in your opinion. It is in essence as it is the self reflection that answers itself.
-
@Allison What would YOU do, for a Klondike Bar? :thinking:
-
-
@Lazz I would take part in a short, fun, & appealing activity. The Klondike bar can boost the appeal of otherwise neutral quirkiness you wouldn't turn your mind to. If a klondike bar can make something appealing, I'd do it for the klondike bar.
-
@Sassygirl The answer is yes. In all contexts.
-
How much wood could a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?
-
@Sassygirl As much wood as a woodchuck could chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood
-
@Lazz said in Ask me stupid questions.:
@Allison If air is invisible to humans, is water invisible to fish and other sea creatures? :thinking:
This was a fantastic question!
-
@Jessicka Diarrhea spread, ofcourse 😁
-
Mirror mirror on the wall, who is the fairest of them all?
-
@Eucalyptus dang i read fattest but i guess that also applies aaaaaaaaajajajajjaajajaj
-
- Why does our nose run but our feet smell?
- Is the S silent in "Scent" or C?
- Why is it called Chilli if it's hot?
-
@Unknownnn
Q1. Why does our nose run but our feet smell?
A: Noses run because words can be metaphorical & feet smell because the act of smelling is a homonym for a negative smell.
Q2. Is the S silent in "Scent" or C?
A: Neither, they are a conglomerate. When S and C go together, they are, in principle, one letter. As such, it will create a paradox when applying normal rules.
Q3. Why is it called Chilli if it's hot?
A:
I. Of course it's called chili if it's hot. Chili is hot.
II. "it"(the pronoun used generally) isn't called chili just for being hot
III. Because you added an extra L into the word "Chili' to make it a pun. You brought the L on yourself for why this is so.
IIII. Chili is not named after its temperature.(apparently some places outside America use an extra L) -
I didnt put an extra L for a pun though...its actually called "Chilli" in British English and "Chili" in American English.. and since English is a language of the Brits , I guess the official term for it would be Chilli
But that doesnt mean Chili is wrong , it isnt , its just an American version of it , depends on which version we've learnt , I've learnt a mix of both American and British English , some countries use American English..mostly in NA & SA , while some use British , so none of em are wrong