@Ash are you real?
To all english gurus out there π
-
@ragnar the daughter because the mother is doing the action and the word because tells the reason why she is doing the action (my opinion I could be wrong)
-
@ragnar where do ya get these kinda ques bro πππ.....nice ques π and i hope so mother was drunk coz most of them would reply daughter was drunk....haha i wish to be unique πππ ......and it should have been a poll i hope so πwith mother and daughter as options and spoiler as (clue~The Female was Drunk πππ )........
-
@ragnar when your at a party and your friend say get more beer...
-
Well done @RAGNAR bro. Now I want to see who will give correct explanation of this. Everyone who point out English grammatical error please solve this also. I want to pass this question to @strangerdanger and @DamnCuteGuy who are so called English Gurus.
-
@RAGNAR The answer is hidden in the question itself- THE DAUGHTER
-
@femalehellbent lmao
-
@makiboy thanks bruvv ππ
-
-
@ragnar Obviously in the sentence it has ambiguity in it, meaning it can be interpreted in more than one way, which makes ambiguous expressions hard to figure it out.
The question asked, "who was drunk?", the truth is you can't really precisely tell who was drunk because the sentence is assigned with more than one interpretation. The ambiguity of the sentence has the word "she" which it's a lexical item that causes the sentence to be ambiguous in the first place. So, whoever wrote this sentence ( I presume it's you @RAGNAR), assigned the two antecedents which is the mother and the daughter, to the lexical item, "she", without clearly telling which of the two anteceddents is "she", which is why it makes it difficult to precise the interpretation to the sentence.
Some people would say that it was the mother who was drunk, others would say that it was the daughter who was drunk. Everyone will have different opinions about it because the sentence obviously doesn't clarify who is drunk. It could be either the mother or the daughter.
Ambiguous sentences are the worse, just makes it a whole lot confusing really :joy:
......just saying :blush:
-
@ragnar The person who wrote this sentence was drunk lmao
This is an ambiguous sentence, nothing is precise. -
With this phrasing, the daughter was drunk. If it were the mother, the phrasing would be: βBecause she was drunk, the mother beat her daughter.β
-
-
@RAGNAR Dont tell me you were drunk when you posted this.
-
@sup nooppe π, i wasnt
-
The mother was drunk
-
@abby-83 said in To all english gurus out there π:
@ragnar the daughter because the mother is doing the action and the word because tells the reason why she is doing the action (my opinion I could be wrong)
No I'm pretty sure that's grammatically correct but I'm not certified or anything.
-
To all the people who did research on this just to be called the "English guru":
Hats off but get well soon. -
@ragnar
SHE
was drunk. -
-
@ragnar
SHE
= THE RIGHT SHE