@Batman oh this is what you want me to reply to. K
The reason why I WILL NOT WATCH ANY VIDEOS OR READ ANY ARTICLES THAT ANYBODY SENDS is to enhance the debating experience, you will have to summarise what the videos/articles say WITH TEXT so i can respond WITH TEXT so other people can read what we're saying and join in. That's not it. In fact i already watched the vids but the point is that i am not gonna respond to a vid/article. You have to summarise or express naturally what's in the vid so i can respond to it. The reason is that
1st people can read what the person said and when i respond understand what i am rebuking and talking about
2nd sometimes people send articles/videos when they themselves don't understand what's in the video/article so it helps if they skip a step and just write their interpretation
3rd this makes it easier to avoid gish gallop FALLACIES, look up what a gish gallop FALLACY is.
4th I'll allow sending of videos if the person who is sending them is also summarising what's in the videos/articles by text and rendering the videos/articles optional ð
That's what I'll be doing
@vahid-0 said in What is you imagination about god?:
@batman thx bro for ur replying,,,i got that u r not believed in god existance but i say then who create this universe?
Your English sux so I'll reformulate what you said then respond to it
@batman bro, thanks for replying,,,i got that you are an atheist, if you don't believe god exists then who created this universe?
1st you have no reason to think that the thing that caused the universe to exist is a WHO(a conscious being) rather than a WHAT(a material thing)
2nd you have no right to make up an answer to a question if we don't have one yet(This goes for humanity, when know humans evolved from earlier specifies, same for the pyramids and how people say aliens) made them, we don't know what/who created the universe but the most probably theory right now is the multiverse but we also know that the universe doesn't necessarily need a cause.
Extremely small explanation: adding matter and anti-matter gives us nothing and we can reverse that process to get matter and anti-matter from nothing
So you can understand what professor Lawrence Krauss's book talks about, you even have the whole book here:
Ok some more shit
there is no good reason to believe in a god. If you can say that everything has to have a cause except god, i can say everything needs to have a cause except the universe and none of us would have gotten any closer to any truth. Most atheists are agnostic(a-(meaning not or lack)gnostic(having knowledge of)) atheists(a- theist(belief in god)) meaning they do not know for certain if there is a god or not but still do not believe because they've yet to find a good reason to. Point is that until science(the field of astrophysics in this case) has a SCIENTIFIC theory(theory means something completely different in science than otherwhere)
explaining the origins of the universe then no one knows and YOU don't get to give made up answers like "god" which you can't even clearly define for all we care. It's funny how the 2 fields of science(Astrophysics and Biology) that most focus on origins of things are the most atheist, i wonder why... because there is no proof for your made up answers
Any questions?