i mean if its 2 guys. but if its the other way around then nope
Stop being gay - I will not put a longer title TWS
-
@thestrangest It doesn't matter how many upvotes they have you didn't read what some of them were saying what i'm saying is drank is still correct but it's not used as much because it's confused with being intoxicated. But you're so caught up with proving me wrong you can't even see that
-
Stop trolling lol @SUmof1
-
@sumof1 said in Stop being gay - I will not put a longer title TWS:
@thestrangest It doesn't matter how many upvotes they have you didn't read what some of them were saying what i'm saying is drank is still correct but it's not used as much because it's confused with being intoxicated.
No man. "Drank" is not the past participle of the verb "drink" so it should not be used after have /had
But you're so caught up with proving me wrong you can't even see that
You can also say "all he did was spoke" like 21 savage does for all i care but you have to recognise that it's not proper English but instead street talk. I really don't care how you say it just know that "drank" is not the past participle and is not supposed to be used after have/had.
P.S. there is a reason why the most upvoted response is called "best answer" on every single one of these websites
-
@hermes said in Stop being gay - I will not put a longer title TWS:
Stop trolling lol @SUmof1
Hi Hermes. What was the last message you delivered to the Olympian Gods about?
-
@thestrangest That wasn't my point, i'm trying to tell you that drank is still correct. The reason it isn't used in standard dialogue anymore is to avoid association with alcohol. i can do this all day i'm not wrong.
-
@sumof1 what do you mean by correct? It isn't grammatical correct, that's for sure. If you mean correct as in acceptable then sure(just not in English class)
-
@thestrangest i'm basing this off from the comment from the first picture i sent, it was correct from 17th to the 19th century but after that it was considered to be synonymous to 'inebriate' but it has always been acceptable.
-
@sumof1 hmmm. Interesting. Now that you add the date it helps. So it was correct and used a lot from around the 16 hundreds to the end of the 18 hundreds. Good to know. I for some reason want to know more now. I wonder where i can
-
@thestrangest yes, that's what i've been trying to get you to see, finally. you can read more about it on that site.
-
@sumof1 do you think there's a word for the history of a word?
-
@thestrangest probably not, why don't we make one for it now?
-
@sumof1 well etymology is the origins of a word
-
@sumof1 what is the etymology of etymology? I know "logy" comes from λόγος(prononce logos) in greek. But What about étymo at the beginning of etymology, let me google it
-
@thestrangest well since this whole thing felt like a process what about adding a ring to it that makes it sound like a process something like photosynthesis is but not as complicated
-
@thestrangest vathýtetymology how does that sound i got the vathyt from deeper or revised since finding the history of history is digging deeper in time
-
@sumof1 the etymo- in etymology comes from ετυμος (prononced etumos) in greek. And Victory in green le ιστορία(prononced istoria) in greek. So shouldn't the history of a word be something like istorology/ histology/historology
Coming from
ιστορία(prononce istoria) meaning history in greek
λογος (pronounced logos) meaning "word" in greek
-
This is a sick message delete it (:
-
@thestrangest It does sound like a real thing.
-
@millzzz i don't have enough privileges
-
@sumof1 well let's see. After further research i found out that from the options i found(istorology/ histology/historiology) histology and historiology are taken:
so the only possibility that's left is istorology/istorology/istology