Stop being gay - I will not put a longer title TWS

[SUmof1]

@catwoman nope, don't need to

[TheStrangest]

@sumof1 said in Stop being gay - I will not put a longer title TWS:

I want a detailed explanation as to why people choose to be gay and don't tell me this is just how i feel or i was born this way because a that's a load of crap.

Well it is true that people are born gay, you just sound like "can somebody please tell me how the storks deliver babies? And don't tell me that babies come from sexual intercourse and that 9 months  after the male spermatozoon fertilises the female egg you get the baby, CUZ THAT'S A BUNCH OF BULL CRAP" Jigga, my point is that you sound stupid as fuck.

(You don't have to watch this video and it doesn't necessarily have to do much with the arguments I'm going to prove next but it's a good one)

If you can't do that then go fuck your sheep and don't bother commenting.

Ouuuu. Mr. FUCKBOY is angry. Bitch shut the fuck up and talk nice because I'm not gonna be able to tell you anything whilst you are telling me to go fuck a sheep ok? I know how to be angry too, being angry doesn't make you more right.

If you think being gay is unnatural well then you are wrong by the definition of the word unnatural.
Definition of unnatural:
"contrary to the ordinary course of nature; abnormal."

So since

1 there are a lot of species that have homosexual behaviours in nature
2 since being gay for humans is proven to be genetically caused by the X28q chromosome
3 since we know being gay isn't a choice because of the fact that in 2015 a professor created an algorithm that can guess the sexual orientation of someone with 70% accuracy(I'm sure that in the past 3 years that percentage has improved tho)
4 since being gay doesn't harm humanity because there is an overpopulation on earth
5 studies in psychology do not agree that homosexuality is a mental disorder

That means that being gay is not

"contrary to the ordinary course of nature; abnormal."
But is natural
Definition of natural:
"existing in or derived from nature; not made or caused by humankind." (When you say people decide to be gay you mean that homosexuality is caused by human kind)

So you are by definition are wrong if you say that "being gay is unnatural".

The truth isn't a matter of opinion. If you disagree that's your right but if you actually want to prove me wrong you will have to prove these 5 things

1 there aren't a lot of animals that have sexual behaviours in nature

https://www.google.fr/search?q=pictures+of+animals+doing+homosexual+acts&safe=strict&client=ms-android-orange-fr&prmd=ivn&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiGq8_e1IjVAhWJBsAKHRkWCRoQ_AUICSgB&biw=360&bih=560#imgrc=_

And

https://www.google.fr/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_animals_displaying_homosexual_behavior&ved=0ahUKEwjE0NfE04jVAhUGWRoKHcc6DeUQFggjMAE&usg=AFQjCNGDP6wZDnS4FHtiu1M4KSTWSE3L8Q

2 being gay as a human is a choice and not genetic and caused by the X28q chromosome

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xq28

3 being gay is a choice which isn't disproved by the fact that in 2015 a professor created an algorithm that can guess the sexual orientation of someone with 70% accuracy

https://www.google.fr/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/society/2015/oct/08/algorithm-predicts-sexual-orientation-men-70-accuracy&ved=0ahUKEwiqrpP0jovVAhUHKcAKHYHEDQAQFggjMAA&usg=AFQjCNH-9bteaarEPqenxig4847QPtQwFQ

4 since being gay somehow harms humanity because there is not an overpopulation on earth

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_overpopulation

5 that studies in psychology do agree that homosexuality is a mental disorder

https://www.psychiatry.org/news-room/apa-blogs/apa-blog/2016/03/homosexuality-as-a-mental-disorder-simply-not-backed-up-by-science

But if you do comment i want to know why you choose to go against everything knowing that your religion tells you otherwise

Let me 1st talk about belief

When we use the 2nd meaning of faith(from the definition of faith in the dictionary):strong belief in the doctrines of a religion, based on spiritual conviction rather than proof.

Do you NEED faith to believe in your religion, as in, can you believe in your religion without faith?

Usually the answer is no

i didn't chose to be an atheist, it happened because i saw no sufficient evidence behind the religious claims, if there was evidence i would believe and of course faith is not a reliable pathway to truth since it can lead you to true and wrong conclusions with incredible inaccuracy so using it is useless

Why use an UNRELIABLE PATHWAY TO TRUTH to believe that something is TRUE. I don't thank that's a good idea, i think you got my point

Let me now talk about god and punishment

If you are a typical homophobic theist then you believe that

1st God sends people to hell including gays

2nd god is all knowing(omniscient)

3rd god created the world

Freedom is an illusion in a world with or without god.

If god knows everything before it even happened that means that everything is predetermined and that you have no choices in life but to follow what god already knows is going to happen and don't come at me with "god knows your fate but you can also change your fate" because If god KNOWS your fate and then you CHANGE your fate that means that god didn't know your fat fate therefore isn't omniscient.

So god KNEW while he was creating the universe that certain people were going to hell before they even existed. And then he created them just so he can put them in hell forever. What a fucking asshole he is.

ALL RELIGION IS WRONG. NO GODS EXIST AND IF YOURS DID THEN HE'S A PIECE OF SHIT, got it?

(BTW this is kind of a modified version of this argument:

)

if you're an atheist the like most atheists you have a good understanding of how nature works and what goes where so i have high hopes for hearing from some atheists, don't disappoint me

Oh I do not disappoint but be nice or you and your question can go fuck yourselves, you think only 1 person(other than me) responded to you so far because people aren't seeing your post? Hell nah they just don't want to waste time on a repugnant cuck

[SUmof1]

@thestrangest Ok so you gave me a long ass answer, but listen here you blind fuck when the fuck did i ask for this? i said i want to know the evaluation phases that go on inside the mind of a person how they come to conclude it and why do they choose to live with and not change. But what did you tell me? the definition of nature, what the fuck? then you talk about gay animals, again what the fuck? did i ask you tell me about animals? i think i know why though because you totally ignored my reply to catwoman where i said that i want the evaluation that happens inside the mind of a gay person, do i see that anywhere here? no i fucking don't. Try and read the question next time you edgy fuck, not to mention do you even know how to structure an argument? you say 1st i will talk about this but you're talking about in the end, if i talked about all the flaws in your reply i would be here all day. All you've really done is copy paste useless information that i didn't even ask for. if you think writing a long response makes you right then you must be one dumb fuck, next time you get triggered and your sensitive ass goes into a reflex arc take some time to re-read the question and give only what is asked for. Moreover, when did i say anything about it being unnatural? did you just fucking assume i did? you just let google do all the explaining. Thanks for wasting my fucking time you twat.

[TheStrangest]

@sumof1 said in Stop being gay - I will not put a longer title TWS:

@thestrangest Ok so you gave me a long ass answer, but listen here you blind fuck when the fuck did i ask for this?

Oh wow. So your post was not meant for people to read or answer. How enlightening

i said i want to know the evaluation phases that go on inside the mind of a person how they come to conclude it and why do they choose to live with and not change

Hm 1st genetics cause behaviours that can't be changed consciously. That's kind of the whole point of the "It's genetic" argument

2nd of all. The word "evolution" isn't mentioned 1 time in your post and noone can conclude from reading what you said that you were asking for an evolutionary explanation for the existence of homosexuality. Homosexuality was a genetic mutation like all other aspects of the human genome and did not evolve in the human brain by conscious means, now after this mutation spread as humans continued breeding it somehow still survived even though gay people are really unlikely to reproduce, how did that happen you might ask, well here is an explanation by an evolutionary biologist:

But what did you tell me? the definition of nature, what the fuck? then you talk about gay animals, again what the fuck? did i ask you tell me about animals?

Hmmm your question was ambiguous as fuck so don't tell me that i gave an answer that had nothing to do with what you asked. I explained how homosexuality is 1. Natural(it exists by natural means in nature among all animals... THAT'S WHY I TALKED ABOUT ANIMALS RETARD) 2. Genetic 3456...Whatever you got the idea

i think i know why though because you totally ignored my reply to catwoman where i said that i want the evaluation that happens inside the mind of a gay person, do i see that anywhere here?

I DID NOT READ THAT. WHY WOULD I... YOUR MAIN QUESTION PRESUMABLY IN THE TOPIC or else you should have said in your topic "please read all the replies to previous people who tried to answer me before providing your own arguments" in the topic

no i fucking don't.

Well i just provided it.

Try and read the question next time you edgy fuck, not to mention do you even know how to structure an argument?

Ouuuu. Fuckboy wants to explain to me what theses are and how to write them leading to a conclusion

you say 1st i will talk about this but you're talking about in the end, if i talked about all the flaws in your reply i would be here all day.

Ouuu fuckboy doesn't realise that i talked about many different topics and the chronology of the assertions are not theses that lead to a conclusion therefore the order doesn't matter but the contents of the assertions do.

All you've really done is copy paste useless information that i didn't even ask for

Hmmm. Technically when you say that people chose to be gay that is an assertion that i can try to debunk with or without you having asked for a counter argument

if you think writing a long response makes you right then you must be one dumb fuck

Uhmmm. You do realise that this whole post is a big straw man argument because you aren't responding to any of my statements but instead making fun of how i wrote them or that you didn't want them in the 1st place. My arguments are valid as fuck and unless you point out fallacies then that means that they as far as i care are always valid

next time you get triggered and your sensitive ass goes into a reflex arc take some time to re-read the question and give only what is asked for

BITCH. NOT ONCE IN YOUR POST DID YOU SAY THE WORD EVOLUTION OR ASK FOR AN EVOLUTIONARY PSYCHOLOGICAL EXPLANATION FOR THE EXISTENCE OF HOMOSEXUALITY

Moreover, when did i say anything about it being unnatural? did you just fucking assume i did?

I said "IF YOU BELIEVE..." because you clearly think being gay is wrong for some reason and the most common argument given by people who think that is "it is unnatural"

you just let google do all the explaining. Thanks for wasting my fucking time you twat.

Hmmm. You do realise that all the things written in my last reply which were copied... were copied from previous debates and they are all MY ARGUMENTS. I didn't just google shit

[TheStrangest]

@sumof1 sorry i found some mini errors that you probably didn't notice and fixed them. If there is something you didn't understand in my last post you can reread it now

[SUmof1]

@thestrangest holy shit you're actually retarded, once again you failed to answer what the post was asking for, and you not reading the previous comments is your fault. Do you just start pasting your response whenever you see the words 'gay' and 'wrong'? or do you actually look at the thread? I don't want to know what nature you autistic feminist. You really are just copy pasting, you don't even use conscious thought. You just link to videos and articles how is that not letting google or the internet in general do your explaining for you? unless ofcourse you're one of these scientists but based on what i've seen so far i doubt it. And again there's countless grammar and spelling mistakes which automatically makes you less credible and makes me question whether i should even waste my time on you. When you talk about debunking BITCH when the fuck bitch, when the fuck did i ask you to debunk this shit? and how the fuck do you debunk an opinion? Is it so hard to get an actual response and not some copy pasted crap, and you say that you copy paste it from your previous arguments how the fuck does that even work? are all these questions the same? You're just some dumb twat.

[TheStrangest]

@sumof1 said in Stop being gay - I will not put a longer title TWS:

@thestrangest holy shit you're actually retarded, once again you failed to answer what the post was asking for, and you not reading the previous comments is your fault.

You didn't say that they contained anything important i need to hear so it is your fault. Maybe they were just a constant repetition of the words "ASS" and "TITS"

Do you just start pasting your response whenever you see the words 'gay' and 'wrong'?

Bitch. What do you want, is there even a specific thing you want to know or are you just bashing gays for the sake of bashing gays. I don't get it

or do you actually look at the thread?

I read what you say and i add what i conclude is useful input, when a person asks for something they don't say half of what they are asking for 1st then the rest when someone responds

I don't want to know what nature you autistic feminist

Hmmm. "What nature you autistic feminist" what nature? What nature? Is it just me or does the structure of your sentence make no sense. Even more i am not autistic nor a feminist(as in feminazi but otherwise i support Ayaan Hirsi Ali and Malala Yousafzai type feminism) but i guess you're just using those as insults

You really are just copy pasting

To copy paste from YOURSELF instead of re-writing shit is not wrong. Why would it be?

you don't even use conscious thought

How does a person not use conscious thought in an argument, i don't think that's even possible

You just link to videos and articles how is that not letting google or the internet in general do your explaining for you?

BITCH, i can just hear the video and write what the guy is saying but that takes ages, i already know what Richard Dawkins says in the 1st video and that he reiterates a bit more in the second, you asked for an explanation on how homosexuality evolved to be included in the human genome and Richard Dawkins answered. Want me to summarise what he says in the video? Tell me, otherwise I'm not gonna waste my time copying word for word what he says because you don't want to watch a fucking video

unless ofcourse you're one of these scientists but based on what i've seen so far i doubt it.

if someone isn't a scientist and is talking about shit he's heard from scientists then it's just as good

And again there's countless grammar and spelling mistakes which automatically makes you less credible and makes me question whether i should even waste my time on you.

1st my sentences are clear enough for you to understand everything and my grammar doesn't make me a less credible source of information. How does that even make sense? That's just an ad-hominim

2nd Go ahead point out some errors, i don't think there are any which can't be explained by, 1st look at your keyboard(mine is a smart phone keyboard), then look at the out of place letter in the misspelled word, then see if the right letter is right beside it, yes it is so it was just a miss click. Or it can be auto correct, why is this shit important? This has nothing to do with the validity of my arguments

When you talk about debunking BITCH when the fuck bitch

I debunked the assertion that being gay is unnatural and bad by providing a valid argument

when the fuck did i ask you to debunk this shit?

Do you think i care if you ask or not? You don't think being gay is ok, which means i can provide arguments for why it's ok

and how the fuck do you debunk an opinion?

It being an opinion doesn't make it free from criticism. Some opinions are just wrong. Ex:"i believe that black is a colour" believe it or not that opinion is wrong

Is it so hard to get an actual response and not some copy pasted crap

You know that i could just have rewritten things i said before just as they are without copying them and that would change literally nothing. Lots of things being copy pasted from somewhere doesn't change anything, that's just called research.

and you say that you copy paste it from your previous arguments how the fuck does that even work?

Me-have debate
You-start new similar one
Me-recycle things i said in the last debate

are all these questions the same? You're just some dumb twat.

Yeah your questions are pretty basic and by the way even if i was a dumb twat(which I'm clearly not) that doesn't change the validity of any of my arguments, what you continue to provide are just textbook cases of ad-hominim and strawman fallacies

[TheStrangest]

@sumof1 jeez you're right. There are many errors i spotted. That's just because I'm angry and typing fast as hell, there are no other debates in which i was this angry in the past 1-3 months. Anyways all the errors i spotted in my last post are gone. Go ahead and respond if you want

[SUmof1]

@thestrangest Honestly you haven't given me the explanation i wanted and you're not getting to it either so you can stop responding now.

[TheStrangest]

@sumof1 WHAT THE FUCK IS YOUR QUESTION CUNT. THERE IS ONLY ONE QUESTION YOU ASKED IN YOUR ORIGINAL POST AND IT IS

"I want a detailed explanation as to why people choose to be gay"

And I've shown you enough evidence for you to understand that homosexual is not a choice, ok.

That question is, might i add, followed by

"and don't tell me this is just how i feel or i was born this way because a that's a load of crap."

BITCH WHAT?

This quote captures this situation perfectly:

[SUmof1]

@thestrangest Are you gay?

[TheStrangest]

@sumof1 No I'm not

[TheStrangest]

@sumof1 but why would that even matter. Would what I'm saying be wrong just because I'm gay?

[TheStrangest]

@sumof1 I'm going to eat. Ttyl

[SUmof1]

@thestrangest THEN WHY THE FUCK HAVE YOU BEEN WASTING MY TIME. I said i want the decisions they had to make and how they weighed each of their options if you aren't gay then why the fuck do you even care. Such a fucking waste of my time.

[SUmof1]

@thestrangest Once again learn to fucking read.

[TheStrangest]

I'm back. Fyi i intentionally write god with a lower case G. if you didn't know, now you know jigaaa
@sumof1 said in Stop being gay - I will not put a longer title TWS:

@thestrangest THEN WHY THE FUCK HAVE YOU BEEN WASTING MY TIME. I said i want the decisions they had to make and how they weighed each of their options if you aren't gay then why the fuck do you even care. Such a fucking waste of my time.

BITCH WTF. WHY WOULD YOU CARE? Do you think only gay people can talk about homosexuality?

Even if i was gay i wouldn't just answer your questions straight ahead, I'd first respond to the assertions inside the questions. When you ask "why did you chose to be gay" I'd first explain why being gay isn't a choice, when you ask "how do you go against your religion in such a way" I'd first explain why religion is BS like i said and then why somehow my supposed religion is comparable with me being gay because there are no homophobic verses in it or that the clearly homophobic verses SOMEHOW don't mean what they mean(which is stupid but any attempt to justify religious nonsense is destined to be stupid), you know ...something like that. The same goes for other questions. If you're a homophobic theist then i can critique your belief in god without too, caring if such critiques are welcome or not. I can say many things that are extremely relevant, if you really just want gays to answer for some reason then ask questions that only gay people can answer/ deconstruct and debunk the assertions inside

[SUmof1]

@thestrangest But did i ask you to explain why being gay is not a choice? No i didn't mama. Mama why you gotta waste my time with shit i din't wanna know just stop responding and go have a latte or something

[TheStrangest]

@sumof1 said in Stop being gay - I will not put a longer title TWS:

@thestrangest Once again learn to fucking read.

Once again. I wouldn't just not answer because you only want gays to answer, if you are bashing any group of people(with assertions) for what they can't control then I'd provide what evidence i have against your assertions

[SUmof1]

@thestrangest How does learning to read have anything to do with gays? The way you jump to conclusions is truly incredible you play the game of assumption.