Fez#4674*
Ask an expert about relationships and manliness, femininity.
-
This here is exactly a clear illustration for you. of what i was talking about. Of course this does not need to be the reason for why your man did hurt your feelings, i can not be sure. But i hope it made things a little more clear? :)
-
You needed 3 replies to answer me? Pretty emotional for someone that claims to be so intelligent and understanding of their own nature. Flynn effect? For the sake of reason, please name the proper ones. Dunning-Kruger feels closer. It is, however, pointless to continue, you have taken onto the path of believing what is convenient for you. Oh, and you might be able to help by actually being interested in what one has to say. @Ash29, would you like to be more explicit on what exactly happened?
-
@tempname420 Again, you are emotionally implying that an amount (3) has something to do with qualitiy, this is, again, reductio ad absurdum? The case that i mistakenly said flynn, instead of kruger, and that you must jump on it to disprove aaaaaall what i said, is a gain, reductio ad hominem you are trying to muster "common" opinion of the people that your insights, are equal to my being wrong. Why are so desperately trying to disprove me i wonder. And also, furthing that, is that you so "gallantly" have found the "right" way of doing things which of course, is to do whatever you are doing not "explaining" 3 times. You are recieving feedback at the lowest rung. I Took your feedback at the highest point, if i saw there was any type of merit i would change it.
Such as: Flynn, its not flynn, flynn is the dubious effect of IQ standardisations going up. And you have not disproven anything rather made a bigger fool out of yourself yet again. But you can not see that can you, and it is pretty sad.
-
@tempname420 said in Ask an expert about relationships and manliness, femininity.:
You needed 3 replies to answer me? Pretty emotional for someone that claims to be so intelligent and understanding of their own nature. Flynn effect? For the sake of reason, please name the proper ones. Dunning-Kruger feels closer. It is, however, pointless to continue, you have taken onto the path of believing what is convenient for you. Oh, and you might be able to help by actually being interested in what one has to say. @Ash29, would you like to be more explicit on what exactly happened?
Of course, my sneaking suspicion is that you are doing all of this in hopes of becoming the glorious hero who so bravely stood up to the scary informed university guy and actually cared about ash genuinely. " you might be able to help" implies you KNOW how to help. "actually being interested" implies that you KNOW ME TO NOT BE INTERESTED. To say "being interested, also implies, that you are doing the logical fallacy of argumentum ad passionum. Again strengthening said hypothesis that this is your actual reason for acting like this. This also rings well with your initial joke of a response where you tried to look good as well, finding some fault that was no there of course to make urself bigger. Now what further is true, is that you want to make yourself look BETTER by saying oh "it took you so much words, and attempts to win over big me". Yeah you are a real big guy saying that are ya.
So to summarize your brilliance. too many fallacies to count, you did plead to the masses that am both emotional "FOR WRITING ALOT" instead of THOROUGH FOR THINKING ALOT, which would then turn out to be reductio ad absurdum and strawmaning and all what not else.
What was it now "Is this like a place you feed your ego on? Well, well, learning so much about human behavior and still unable to introspect." implying you oh savior can know, about of course, since you are taking a dubious moral highroad of falsehood.
You are a fool of a person for doing this, and you are mock, a tremendous mock out of the art of argument, and frankly, you are making a mock out of yourself more so. And why would you without neither formal training or knowledge be so wise to think that you are the omnipotent knower of faults and solutions. I do wonder, and i do not easily dismiss your "search for good true things" as just that. You probably want something much more low and disgusting than that, and like a little weasel that kicks down the guy who got bullied, you will feel better standing on someones back for a while. That is what it seems to me, and oh by the way, this is not a professional statement, it is just my opinion of you as a person.
-
Finally, i feel that it is my responsibility here to say that both the intial girl who said "so what i post hitler" and her follow up copy who took suit of her ways of talking and arguing, are not to blame for their inadequacies. You see, people do not know how to argue, and that is why argumentation is a scientifical endeavour. And that is why i can disprove the relative validness of what they say, and any one who knows these things will see the same thing. And the more they do not, of course see, the less they will become good at actually winning arguments without hurting people.
This does not mean they are bad people, or bad argumentators, or even wrong (i found two instances, where they were right. This was that it was pretentiously arrogant of me to "throw hooks out" and list my merits. I got accused of being pompous without self inflection which of course, was wrong of them to do, and a fallacy because it would rather be construed as narcissism if anything at all. But if you were not trying to reduce the author to look better i.e (ad hominem) you would then never even say that most likely. And another fallacy such as ad passionem when he tries to purport that my writing alot, has to do with me, being angry alot. Which is another argumentative fallacious statement since he then is saying that i am not in capable form to deal with affect. (1) and also, that he was so right, that i was so angry to spend the time out of spite rather than wanting to find a common good. This he can not be sure of, but the thing is that why would you think so highly of yourself to think that your little opinion carried any weight. It carries for me an opportunity to teach what NOT to EVER do when arguing. Let us take hitler as an example, a man who never explained anything in full but actually did exactly this. Reductio ad passionem ad hominem ad absurdum. And this is your playbook my fallacious friend and you can not be a dirty player, mean while saying that you are so noble to have done this. You should have of course seen that i am doing this to somehow give infromation that is not widely available or accumulated. And what you do is say "he took it all from wikipedia, another personal attack to reduce the impact of what is done. And from there on they keep doing wrong all the way down the thread. Except when there was one mention that the flynn effect, has nothing to do, with the flynn effect. And you can stand proud for doing at least that one thing right cant you. Stop your nonsense, grow up, and learn to talk. I have not even in the slightly tried to bring you down here, i sloppily list things i know, and i could dig out a million other ways to disprove your ways, but i dont bother, because i do not have it as a goal, to crush you. You are not as important as you might imagine and i am sorry to burst your bubble about that.
PS: all your downvotes prove me further right its ridiculous you are behaving very childsih.
-
@tempname420 exactly sticky nose strikes again. That's what I expected.
-
@tempname420 yes Ashley, Mr. sticky nose here will help you out with his big nose that satisfies his ego in that way he doesn't have to feel inferior.
-
@Psymaster It was already quite obvious that you have no idea what you are talking about, but with these comments in response to Ash's question, it becomes quite clear that you have no experience in any medical or psychological fields, not even in writing papers about it.
Anyone, just anyone who even has a little understanding of psychology/meds etc. knows that to adequately answer any question any cliënt has, you need to gather information.
And besides, you didn't even respond to the question at hand. You just spew some random shit around....
-
@Psymaster what r ur views on hotwifing ?
-
@EggBoi33 you see now the expert needs your help, i think you are the expert in this subject can you help me understand what it means
