Science and God



  • Would you rather stand for science or go with belief in God?



  • Science 🙌
    Atheist here



  • I'll stand for science ,ill sit for god.
    through god i can see everything in simpler way in simple dimension,and i dont think it is necessary to stand . On the contrary to this, science only stimulate me to see the things not only in the simple two three dimension but also in alternative dimension of those which've been already designed by my human fellow buff a lows.



  • Science
    My religion has unfortunately been forced on me


  • Watch Anime Eyes Gamers

    Science is bcoz of god...God have forbid things behind science which humans r trying to study now....God knows science, god knows everything, god made science


  • Watch Anime Eyes Banned

    @lucky9 Science demonstrates that there is no reason to believe a god exists and that most religious claims like creationism are fairy tales opposing things proven by science. Philosophy says that faith is useless and believing something without evidence is just gullibility. Religion has basically spread with this slogan "Too stupid to understand science? Try religion"


  • Watch Anime Eyes Banned

    @allight said in Science and God:

    @lucky9 Belief in God IS scientific.

    Bullshit. How are you gonna justify this bullshit statement

    Everything in this world, the more we know, the more we feel we have yet to discover

    And then YOU the religious person start to make up shit because we don't know. If we don't know that doesn't give you the right to make shit up, it only means that noone knows until we discover the answer

    it all points to one designer who made it such.

    Bullshit. See you just used an argument from ignorance. "We don't know therefore god". No you religious ignoramus nothing points to an invisible man in the sky and your belief is unjustified since there is no evidence backing it up

    For there is a balance and a carefully crafted design in this universe.

    Bullshit. Global warming, supernovas, 99% of all species who ever lived being extinct, cancer, wisdom teeth, tail bones, genetic disorders... this is not good design nor design, noone created the world and earth, they came about by natural processes and we know what most those natural processes were and for the natural processes we don't know that doesn't mean that god created them, it means we don't know yet.

    It cannot be a product of mere chance as atheists say.

    It is dumbass. That's why 93% of astrophysicists and 80% of biologists are atheist. They're the ones that study this shit and they're the ones that say it's mere chance and have all the evidence backing up their claims. You don't study this shit and have no evidence backing up your claims so your opinion is worthless

    In fact atheism confuses a person more

    Bullshit. You're not an atheist so how would you know? Atheism is only the disbelief in god. Not an ideology for it to confuse someone. Religion has basically spread with the slogan "Too stupid to understand science, try religion" so if you are saying that being an atheist by following the facts and understanding the science is complicated therefore people chose religion then that makes sense

    for it cannot explain life and death

    Bullshit we know 100% that life came from evolution and we know 100% that the brain is MOST LIKELY just an assembly of neurons that will stop functioning after death resulting in the loss of consciousness and no afterlife.

    misfortunes that happen etc.

    Misfortune?

    "Misfortune happens, deal with it"

    Is basically the mindset of atheists and i do not see how it makes things more complicated. It's better than praying to an invisible man you can't prove and trying to block out from your mind, the fact that if an all knowing, all powerful being exists therefore when something horrible happens (like the annual gruesome deaths of 9 million kids under the age of 5) it is because god didn't want/feel like stopping it with his omnipotence

    Everything has a reason for it to happen,

    Bullshit. Everything happens for no reason. Purpose is arbitrary and only exists in the mind therefore stops existing after death. Nothing EXISTS for a purpose unless you give it one in your brain.

    if Christianity doesn't give the full picture doesn't mean all religions don't.

    All religions are cancer and are made up garbage

    Atheists basically paint everything the same colour and deliberately refuse to look into things

    Hahaha. Says the person who believes things without evidence and good reason(s) to the person who only believes things with evidence and good reason(s).

    cuz it conflicts with their own desires.

    Bullshit. A lot of atheists like the idea that there might be something after death and that there is an invisible sky daddy looking after you all the time(i personally don't) but don't believe it since there is no evidence or good reason to



  • I'd go with 50 50


  • Gamers

    we need a complete understanding of both before answering that question, and our knowledge about both of these is far from being perfect



  • @lucky9 Belief in God IS scientific. Everything in this world, the more we know, the more we feel we have yet to discover, it all points to one designer who made it such. For there is a balance and a carefully crafted design in this universe. It cannot be a product of mere chance as atheists say. In fact atheism confuses a person more, for it cannot explain life and death, misfortunes that happen etc. Everything has a reason for it to happen, if Christianity doesn't give the full picture doesn't mean all religions don't. Atheists basically paint everything the same colour and deliberately refuse to look into things cuz it conflicts with their own desires.



  • @thestrangest why are you so offended? and what makes you say i use no evidence? You are just disregarding another's views based on a) generalizations about religion and it's adherents b) Personal opinions c) misconceptions about what the scientific community actually says in contrast to what you have been taught or know. I'm guessing "bullshit" is your catch phrase, since you seem to write that quite alot. Watch:


    and

    and


  • Watch Anime Eyes Banned

    @allight said in Science and God:

    @thestrangest why are you so offended?

    Because you believe in evil harmful bullshit

    and what makes you say i use no evidence?

    Because there isn't

    You are just disregarding another's views based on

    Oh here we go. The bullshit begins

    a) generalizations about religion and it's adherents

    Bullshit. I know religion 10× better than you as an ex-muslim and a person who constantly debates religious ignoramuses for fun

    b) Personal opinions

    Duh. Of course it is a personal opinion but one which is backed up by logic, reason and science.

    c) misconceptions about what the scientific community actually says in contrast to what you have been taught or know.

    Bullshit. I am a philosophy geek and have read very well into this specific topic

    I'm guessing "bullshit" is your catch phrase

    It has been for like 2 days

    since you seem to write that quite alot

    True

    Watch:

    Bullshit. A video? You are seriously so indifferent to not want to type what the video says? Fucking hell you want me to respond to a video? Bullshit that's a waste of my time just some up what the video says. You have to summarise or express naturally what's in the vid so i can respond to it. The reasons are that
    1st people can read what the person said and when i respond, understand what i am debunking and talking about
    2nd sometimes people send videos when they themselves don't understand what's in the video so it helps if they skip a step and just write their interpretation
    3rd I'll allow sending of videos if the person who is sending them is also summarising what's in the vids by text and rendering the videos optional 😊


  • Watch Anime Eyes Banned

    @allight ARE YOU RETARDED. READ WHAT I SAID ABOUT VIDEOS. I SAID NO VIDEOS, NOT TO EDIT YOUR COMMENT AND ADD 2 MORE VIDEOS



  • It's very possible to go with both...


  • Watch Anime Eyes Gamers


  • Watch Anime Eyes Banned

    @jimmy1708 said in Science and God:

    @TheStrangest I didn't read ur whole long shit text lol

    Well why the f**k should i argue with you. You don't get to nit pick what you respond to. That's cheap

    but I read the part of circumcision lol....u r so uneducated lol

    Says the guy who believes that a year has to be 12 months and that the islamic way of slaughter is better. F**k off you retard

    I'm going to quote this a lot so anything that doesn't have a source bellow it comes from this site

    http://www.intactamerica.org/learnmore

    circumcision doesn't decreases any sexual feelings/desire

    Oh it definitely fucking does

    1st "Okay, so uncircumcised guys may have a slight advantage. What about their GFs? Unfortunately, there's no clear-cut answer about how circumcision affects female pleasure. One recent study from Denmark found that women with circumcised spouses were twice as likely to report dissatisfaction in the sack than those with uncircumcised hubbies—but other studies have shown the opposite. It's true that when an uncircumcised guy's foreskin retracts, it may bunch up around the base of his penis, providing a little extra friction against your clitoris, says Dr. Paduch. "This is going to play a role [in pleasure] for women who have the clitoral pattern of arousal," he says. But to be fair, a cut guy could more than make up for the lack by using his fingers or a dildo."

    Sex with Uncircumcised and Circumcised Men: Is There a Difference? | Shape Magazine
    https://www.shape.com/lifestyle/sex-and-love/sex-circumcised-man-different

    And also female circumcision is in need a total no by any person

    2nd circumcised Masturbation needs much more work. Infact discouraging Masturbation was one of the most used reasons for circumcision

    https://www.google.fr/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://docakilah.wordpress.com/2011/06/15/male-circumcision-originally-created-to-prevent-masturbation/amp/&ved=2ahUKEwigjoTfpOzYAhWGNxQKHZknCOcQFjAIegQIBxAB&usg=AOvVaw0bhxUM_Dd7ap_x0wYOT8D2&ampcf=1

    but even u can say it increases the sexual feelings/desires bcoz the top of dk(most sensitive part is exposed).....circumcissin means just to remove the upper skin from dk top, not to cut the entire d**k lol.....it does not have any special/major side effect....just search on Google advantages and disadvantages

    You don't need to be genius to see how masturbation is harder with a circumcised penis

    of circumcision lol.....it's main advantage is that it reduces the chances of causing hiv.......

    "Myth – Male circumcision helps prevent HIV.
    Fact – Claims that circumcision prevents HIV have repeatedly been proven to be exaggerated or false. Only abstinence or safe sex, including the use of condoms, can prevent the spread of sexually transmitted diseases, including HIV/AIDS."

    Sure dude but there are better ways like condoms. That's not a good enough reason

    and it's disadvantge is that since upper part of dk have no skin, so top of dk will be exposed...... However advantages r far greater than disadvantages And every Sexologist in this world always recommends to do circumcision....

    Bullshit. Are you reading what i write

    "THE FACTS BEHIND CIRCUMCISION

    Newborn male circumcision is the most common surgical procedure performed in the U.S. It's a common misconception that there are tangible health benefits to male circumcision, but the truth is no medical society in the world recommends it. This invasive procedure carries serious health risks, including infection, hemorrhage, surgical mishap, and death, as well many ethical considerations."

    "Myth – Circumcision is routinely recommended and endorsed by doctors and other health professionals.
    Fact – No professional medical association in the United States or anywhere else in the world recommends routine circumcision as medically necessary. In fact, leaving boys intact is becoming the norm in the U.S., as parents realize the risks and harms of circumcision."

    and in between circumcised dk is more pleasurable to a girl's vagina so girls like circumcised dk instead of closed uncircumcised....

    Bullshit. Didn't you read what i read at the beginning here

    1st "Okay, so uncircumcised guys may have a slight advantage. What about their GFs? Unfortunately, there's no clear-cut answer about how circumcision affects female pleasure. One recent study from Denmark found that women with circumcised spouses were twice as likely to report dissatisfaction in the sack than those with uncircumcised hubbies—but other studies have shown the opposite. It's true that when an uncircumcised guy's foreskin retracts, it may bunch up around the base of his penis, providing a little extra friction against your clitoris, says Dr. Paduch. "This is going to play a role [in pleasure] for women who have the clitoral pattern of arousal," he says. But to be fair, a cut guy could more than make up for the lack by using his fingers or a dildo."

    Bruh in the end lol...get some education

    Shut the f**k up

    @jimmy1708 said in Science and God:

    @TheStrangest http://lifestyle.iloveindia.com/lounge/circumcision-pros-and-cons-5440.html

    I already read that shit a long time ago

    @jimmy1708 said in Science and God:

    @TheStrangest

    I know this youtuber and have watched the video. Do you seriously think this interview fucking changes anything with such a small sample size. Fucking understand the scientific method


  • Watch Anime Eyes Banned

    @jimmy1708 said in Science and God:

    @TheStrangest u r kind of person who setted their mind towards Athiesm so powerful

    1st your English sucks
    2nd Well let's start by talking about faith.
    i didn't chose to be an atheist it happened because i say no sufficient evidence behind the religious claims, if there was evidence i would believe and of course faith is not a reliable pathway to truth since it can lead you to true and wrong conclusions with incredible inaccuracy so using it is useless.

    that even if I someone would break the moon in half then join it together again, u will still not believe

    I'd need scientific evidence to know that it wasn't just a hallucination. Duh
    Lol that's how science works.
    But you retard believe that Muhammad did that without any evidence which isn't different fr9m believing in unicorns. You prefer gullibility "Belief first then find or don't find proof" for me it is scepticism "Evidence first then belief"

    good luck for rest of ur life....

    Thanks

    bye

    Bye

    And I don't want to waste my time here to show I proofs lol....bye

    1st your English sucks
    2nd maybe if you spent more time here it'd be better


  • Watch Anime Eyes Gamers

    @TheStrangest
    1st English is not my first language, so why should i care about that fucking language??but I know ur language enough to write it and speak it very properly..
    2nd u r dumbass,idiot
    Bye lol.....



  • Sciences proves that we are too complex to have randomly evolved so guess someone has a hand in it thinks



  • @allight @TheStrangest has already ripped you apart but let me also say some things.
    By definition "science is a systematic enterprise that builds and organizes knowledge in the form of testable explanations and predictions about the universe. "
    How can you test God?
    @allight said in Science and God:

    @lucky9 if Christianity doesn't give the full picture doesn't mean all religions don't.

    Tell me honestly 1 religion that explains everything. From the beginning of life to its meaning. There is none. Also "You live to die" doesn't count.

    Atheists basically paint everything the same colour and deliberately refuse to look into things cuz it conflicts with their own desires.

    Do you see it? Let me help you:

    Religious people basically paint everything the same colour and deliberately refuse to look into things cuz it conflicts with their own desires.

    What is this? The statement is now right?


 

View More Recent Topics