@sarah_the_magpie said :
@Donald-Huebner
ok, bye then
Hopeless! I should've been wise enough as vnair4u to leave this place before writing any new word.
@sarah_the_magpie said :
@Donald-Huebner
ok, bye then
Hopeless! I should've been wise enough as vnair4u to leave this place before writing any new word.
@sarah_the_magpie said in Even at 32, I've never been able to observe that I could consider a girl/woman as someone who does deserve me. I'm feel more proud of this than desirous of condescending; yet I continue to think on it more and more whenever I'm not concentrating on one of my theoretical research problems. Am I wrong anywhere? Any suggestions/recommendations/prescriptions???:
@Donald-Huebner
cool story bro
You're pathetic. It's impossible to explain the prudent things to imbeciles. I think even I'm making a mistake interacting with you all.
I came here on this site only because it had vanir4u's eye opening words. Now that he isn't here anymore, I don't feel like staying at this place full of imbeciles devoid of the very spirit of discourse.
vnair4u then wrote:
{
You're living in a dream world Okay! So don't come to me talking about reality when you've no idea of it. It's you whose eyes are closed, not ours. The forefront blockaders are working night and day restlessly like Sauron's eye of Tolkien's Lord of the Rings. They take no ones' instructions. They, like us, like to force the opponent if they can and to go to hell with the opponents otherwise. The forefront blockaders are growing powerful at an alarming pace. The forefront blockaders will keep doing that in order to ultimately deprive the people of the world of their property and assets until their children wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered. You'd better wake up and realize that the birds who can fly have to hunt for grains. But the ones who can't fly are gifted a dream world where they get free grains. But why? And until when? The reason is that the chicken is ultimately slaughtered and all the investment is retrieved from the pocket of someone who doesn't yield to the guy who had been giving free grains to the chickens all their life. The chickens didn't even know where they all were to be taken in order to be slaughtered. Go teach your TLIG to alive babies of the chickens who've already been slaughtered. I'm far bigger a fan of God than you all but I know his hands are tied. It's high time you all try to start to fight and to think about being responsible.
May God Almighty grant you prudence. And protection until you don't seek prudence.
May peace be upon the poorest on the Earth, as long as it can be, in God Almighty's theory.
}
vnair4u then wrote:
{
Don't make me speak in a manner that none of us want. I haven't yet done that. Maybe I'll start ignoring your words and leave this hell of a domain that's perhaps too bad to not have the incorrect dubbed correct and vice versa, but the point is that I haven't yet done that and I wish to not do that (in this audience, I mean.)
}
vnair4u then wrote:
{
Trust in life itself! Wow!!! As if it made any sense. As if we'd never have wished to. Who will you trust? Until when? God never appears in the world. Not even when a live lamb dies crying for help in the slaughterhouse. Humans are dominating this world. Who will you trust once you surpass the most powerful humans of your field? My child (I mean your experience and not your age)! Try your ultimate best to try to not to trigger a spark in me. Okay?!!! Believe me, you haven't yet! But I'm afraid that your ignorant vastly oversized overconfidence - rather false confidence about being capable of pretending to be confident - might succeed in doing that very soon.
}
vnair4u then wrote:
{
We're the guys who were raised by parents who told us all our life that we need not worry about anything. And that we don't need to do any job. For they had all that we'd ever need. We're the guys who were raised by parents who taught us that one must not give birth to a child if he or she is gonna tell his/her child that the child will have to find a job or create his own business when he/she grows up. We're the guys who were raised by parents who still tell us that we can marry anytime and our sons will never have to find a job or create their own businesses (out of compulsion, I mean.) But we are more responsible than our parents. We believe that one must not give birth to a child if he or she will be unable to assure his or her child that this child will never have to share a public destination like an airport or the road.
I know how much money I must have to be able to give that kind of assurance to my child. I wasn't born in the house of Mittal or Gates. So I have only three choices: become as rich as is needed, or never marry, or become irresponsible. The third one, I'll never do. That's why I said "I will remain single until I become very rich and get at least one private firm of mine listed in the stock exchange".
}
vnair4u then wrote:
{
}
vnair4u then wrote:
{
}
vnair4u had written:
{
Nice naive remarks, full of ignorance and signs of having been created by someone who lives in a dream world that may get shattered and destroyed as and when this someone's Godfather lifts the curtain and opens his eyes. Have you ever thought about the fact that even these kinds of things occur in the world:
}
I am rewriting what he had written. I was so enlightened by it and found it so eye opening that I registered on this site only to react to the imbeciles he was talking to.
Mr. vnair4u, it seems has deleted his words. I think he considered having written something prudent at a domain like this, to be a mistake. A domain that's too bad to not have the incorrect dubbed correct and vice versa.
An albatross, on the other hand, does think about reality. It thinks about the truth of the reality because it is beyond the reach of the humans who slaughter the chickens. It thinks about the truth of the reality because it doesn't "live inside an unreal dream world that may get shattered and destroyed as and when its Godfather lifts the curtain and opens it eyes"
If you never felt that you need to be far stronger than the degree to which one must be in order to be a man who can comprehend what the phrase "being responsible" means to vnair, it was only because you never were beyond the reach of the "forefront blockaders." Such a nice analogy vnair has drawn. The chickens who finally get slaughtered don't have to be wary of the true picture of how dangerous the times have become - both for the weak lives like you and for Almighty God whose "hands are tied".
If you believe that your TLIG stuff makes you find trust in the world, it's only because you "always yield at the forefront". "You'd better wake up and realize that the birds who can fly have to hunt for grains. But the ones who can't fly are gifted a dream world where they get free grains. But why? And until when? The reason is that the chicken is ultimately slaughtered and all the investment is retrieved from the pocket of someone who doesn't yield to the guy who had been giving free grains to the chickens all their life. The chickens didn't even know where they all were to be taken in order to be slaughtered. Go teach your TLIG to alive babies of the chickens who've already been slaughtered."
You, as an instruction taker, tried to suggest naive incorrect things to an instruction maker, about fear. That was utterly ridiculous. He replied: "Who will you trust? Until when? God never appears in the world. Not even when a live lamb dies crying for help in the slaughterhouse. Humans are dominating this world. Who will you trust once you surpass the most powerful humans of your field?" You had no reply to this and you started changing the topic.
If you're not able to simply comprehend what he wrote in such a great detail, you need to ask your doubts and not think about changing the topic.
Anyone who can write what vnair wrote, will expect to be simply believed. I understood his point. That's why I made so much effort on this site (it wasn't allowing me to react without registering).
Now pe7erpark3r, now that you're having no words to defend your misleading incorrect remarks about vnair's original post, or to react to the very well-explained self-contained reply to your naive and misleading reply to vnair's original post, you've begun changing the topic of discussion and started telling lies.
@NathanOnFire said
@vnair4u you refuse to provide your ID
Are you trying to say that something very wise, which will clear all confusions if it gets spoken at a forum of world-class intellectuals by someone of the likes of Einstein or Newton or Gauss or Hilbert, is supposed to get transformed into something invalid at the moment when this same very wise thing is spoken by an ordinary average mind at a forum of ordinary physics professors or internet surfing weirdos who look or woof with equal respect at both the wise stuff and the misleading stuff?
Or are you expecting that an Einstein-level scientist will “provide his ID” at web pages where relationship-related things are discussed?
Any philosophical assertion gets accredited as valid or invalid by means of discourses; and not on the basis of IDs.
... *don’t deserve vnair’s presence ...