@sir-devil said in Godbless everyone:
@thestrangest
Not really, that was a couple hundred years after the start hestoric period and the end of the heroic period. There were a lot if historiens and even some well known ones back then and none of them wrote about "the great achievments and miracles of Jesus" because there were no such things and even to this day there is 0 evidence that jedus even existed and of course the bible is not evidence just like the harry potter books aren't evidence of the existence of Hogwarts existing.
What is the point you are trying to make here? Heroic age is in BCE and we were talking about the things in the Old Testament, which is in BCE and not about Jesus.
Oh sorry i thought you were talking about the bible in general
Stop defending uneducated desert savages nor their worldwide praise.
I am telling your quote right back at you.
"Hey. Don't generalise"
Oh i am gonna generalise. People back then knew as much about existence, the universe and the meaning of life as today's 7 year olds
Uneducated desert savages, huh? Even the common people? Wow!
Yes savages. Stonings? Genetal mutilation? Who does that, them.
In all seriousness, Uneducated?
YES uneducated
I doubt that. Many people were indeed educated back then.
They believed the earth is flat
It was just that they were educated to their standards.
Standards don't change with time.
You can't expect them to learn something that isn't present in their time.
I expect them not to write their ignorance on paper and say it's the word of god. Like the earth being flat or not knowing where the sun went at night
Savages? Of course, they were savage.
People neing savage = Savages.
Remember we are talking about a time period that is in BCE.
Who cares about the time
Every single era before our current modern era was filled with brutal violence and bloodshed.
So what. Well defined standards do not changewith time
There was no choice other than that.
True but that doesn't change anything
There was no sufficient technology to establish a proper communication without the fear of assassination and even if they were in a period of peace, was no one enforcing it.
Unadvanced uneducated savages as i was saying.
So, back then, the only way you could have a proper peace is to capture all of the surrounding territories.
By raping their women and killing their babbies under the commands of god
So yeah, every soldier in all parts of history were savages.
Not really. Some of them were well orginised, educated and not savage by the modern deffinition.
Btw, notice that I said "Soldiers"
I did
stupider
Now, how is it stupider?
supports slavery and violence
Now then, since it was in BCE, The Old Testament was far from perfect. Today, we have people fighting against slavery and violence, which is good.
Yes exactly. Christians claim it's the word of god. I'm saying it supoorts slavery, violence and you agree so let's move on.
But back then, there were none arguing against it.
STOP DEFENDING IT.
They just accepted it as a part of their life. There isn't a single nation that never practiced slavery.
Maybe but there probably was.
History can't be changed. In other words, it used to be like this in the past. In today's world, this won't apply.
True but this is off subject
Let me explain this.
i didn't chose to be an atheist it happened because i say no sufficient evidence behind the religious claims, if there was evidence i would believe and of course faith is not a reliable pathway to truth since it can lead you to true and
wrong conclusions with incredible inaccuracy so using it is useless.
Again, why this reply? You are just repeating what I said. I have already said there is no solid evidence supporting or opposing God.
Cool
In such situation, you took the opposing stance.
Wrong. I didn't take the opposing stance. I fell in it naturally since the only logical conclusion with unicorns is to not believe they exist. Did you TAKE the side which believes unicorns don't exist? I think not
I am not saying that is wrong. You do what you do.
Cool
Testing is a stupid word to say here
Did you notice that I used testing within double quotes and also that it was not the first word that I used?
Sure. You might agree with what i said i just wanted to explain it
it was just copy/paste.
Okay. Anyway, it doesn't make it less rude just because it is a copy-paste.
It kinda does because it's old and i didn't even remember fully how it was. I just wanted to make it relevant
It just shows that there was less work put into it
Therefore less intent to be rude or not