@B3r1n I'm sorry, what do you mean our behavior shouldn't be based on 'relativism'? How does one do that?
Are you suggesting that the moral behavior of not inflicting pain onto someone is an absolute morale and is not relative to behaviorally doing good?
I'm wondering:
There could be ethical absolute s I guess but when we infuse them in our behavior, are we doing it by being relative or through absolutism. And if right and wrong, as you said, is so relative to the society we live in; is it better to have codified ethics or follow natural caring?
Posts made by Kant do it
-
RE: Who decides what's right or wrong?