pretty diverse actually; but I do listen to death metal most of the time

I personally am a skeptic regarding this topic. Time travel paradoxes are just too fitting in my perspective. Yes, minute physics has already attempted to answer this grandfather paradox, but it just doesn't make sense to me at least.
Feel free to ask questions!

thanks

@Vicious-Retard just depressing to see how humans are so denial of their nature. the closest we could get from being real isn't even worth a mention. we instead created our own playplace; a pathetic arbitrary reality.

16personalities might be the most popular MBTI testing site (and has by far the most decent UI), but the scoring system is a bit flawed. 16personalities pretty much identifies the type of an examiner by tallying his responses between the polar ends of the spectrum (I or E, T or F, etc.). This might be misleading since MBTI's identification system should solely lie based on the resulting function stack of the examiner. Function stacks are the core of MBTI; whereas most would think a one-letter difference isn't a big deal, but it actually is.
I once tested out as an INFP, but pretty much didn't find myself fit in. I then took my second try and got an INTP-- which by far I believe is my type. It IS a one-letter diferrence but the function stack of each type says a lot. INFPs are Fi dominant, while I think I'm more of an inferior Fe person. I sought help a few times before, and most people told me I maybe just have a well-developed Fe.
Anyways, I'm not trying to discredit 16personalities or something. In fact, they're a great starter for someone interested with typology. Just keep in mind most of the testing sites online aren't as accurate as we might suppose to think.

@Vicious-Retard just depressing to see how humans are so denial of their nature. the closest we could get from being real isn't even worth a mention. we instead created our own playplace; a pathetic arbitrary reality.

pretty diverse actually; but I do listen to death metal most of the time

16personalities might be the most popular MBTI testing site (and has by far the most decent UI), but the scoring system is a bit flawed. 16personalities pretty much identifies the type of an examiner by tallying his responses between the polar ends of the spectrum (I or E, T or F, etc.). This might be misleading since MBTI's identification system should solely lie based on the resulting function stack of the examiner. Function stacks are the core of MBTI; whereas most would think a one-letter difference isn't a big deal, but it actually is.
I once tested out as an INFP, but pretty much didn't find myself fit in. I then took my second try and got an INTP-- which by far I believe is my type. It IS a one-letter diferrence but the function stack of each type says a lot. INFPs are Fi dominant, while I think I'm more of an inferior Fe person. I sought help a few times before, and most people told me I maybe just have a well-developed Fe.
Anyways, I'm not trying to discredit 16personalities or something. In fact, they're a great starter for someone interested with typology. Just keep in mind most of the testing sites online aren't as accurate as we might suppose to think.

I personally am a skeptic regarding this topic. Time travel paradoxes are just too fitting in my perspective. Yes, minute physics has already attempted to answer this grandfather paradox, but it just doesn't make sense to me at least.
Feel free to ask questions!

thanks

you might have already heard of them. these guys are absolute gold; always remind me of the strokes