@boots22 communication is something that, paradoxically, makes relationships harder to establish and maintain. For sure you need communication in the sense " exchange of thoughts, emotions, ideas etc. ", but not in the sense that you establish relationships based only on people who "speak your language"-. A simple example can be that you can't establish relationships only with other gameplayers, because that kind of world, language etc. is more near to you, or just with people that understands something about science etc. Relationship, imho, should be based on the frankness and all paranoia and the shame to be your self are put behind, what I mean is that all the masks should be thrown and that is not simply to base relationships on trust.

Philosophical debate about anything. You don't need to be a philosopher or know something about it, if you want to discuss something then pm. Every topic is accepted.
Languages: english, french, spanish, italian or bulgarian.

@damncuteguy ok... We shall discuss in real time to come to a conclusion or simply to understand eachother, without putting there just opinions. So what I think is that, both on a philosophical and scientifc point of view, it's more logical to think according to the dependent origination. This reality is like an eternal circle, "nothing is created, nothing is destroyed, everything is transformed"-. If you think that in-dependant origination has more sense then you are actually assuming that there is something behind the reality, something trascendental and I will never think in such a foolish way.... Bleahhh metaphysics... That's shit

@jaspergeli Give your definition of cruel. Anyway if two animals can reproduce themselves, like two different breeds of dogs, then, in my opinion, there is nothing cruel, it's nature. Even if a human does something about it, the only thing that I would, maybe, contest is that you shall not force two animals, same or different breed or species, it doesn't matter, to reproduce themselves.

@rakan I'd suggest you "Captain fantastic" , if you did not saw it yet.

@boots22 communication is something that, paradoxically, makes relationships harder to establish and maintain. For sure you need communication in the sense " exchange of thoughts, emotions, ideas etc. ", but not in the sense that you establish relationships based only on people who "speak your language"-. A simple example can be that you can't establish relationships only with other gameplayers, because that kind of world, language etc. is more near to you, or just with people that understands something about science etc. Relationship, imho, should be based on the frankness and all paranoia and the shame to be your self are put behind, what I mean is that all the masks should be thrown and that is not simply to base relationships on trust.

@rakan I'd suggest you "Captain fantastic" , if you did not saw it yet.

Philosophical debate or "standard" discussion.

Every topic is accepted.

Languages: english, french, spanish, italian or bulgarian.

My question, in case, would be: "Shall school be reformed, the whole conception of it, but in particular shall we try to establish a model of a perfect school, thus every nation can have such kind of school (I'm not asking what kind of model you would suggest, but rather if it is a good idea to even think to this eventuality, as today every nation has its own school system) where education comes before instruction and where the locus "school" is not just mandatory place to stay in from hour x to hour x, but also where young people and future citizens can find the "right" environment to prepare themselves to live in society, to be conscious voters, to train their bodies, to find love and/or practice it and so on? If in your nation the school system has already that conception and that system, remember that not every nation has it. My idea in briefly is that we shall start school at the age of 13/14, the locus school is something like a whole real small city, everyone is independent, with that I mean you don't have to go back to family every afternoon... My utopistic idea, and it's really an utopia, is really similar to the school that you see in animes like Yu gi oh GX for example.

@chika Pouring milk for first is just non-sense.

@astrobambina Ok.... Prima di tutto parli italiano?
If not I'd say, in first place, that your question is not actually answerable. I mean what do you mean by internet, all the virtual things? All social networks? Everything associated with technology? What exactly. Second what do you mean by addiction to our brain? You meant something like: " how is modern technology changing our mind? Does our mind get addicted to that technology? "-. And what do you mean by brain? How we reason or behave?
If you remake the question, in order to solve the doubts I've just showed you, I'll try my best to answer.

What I can say is that, for sure, our brain is stimulated, I mean the way technology stimulates both our way of thinking and behaving is something true. Our brain is "fascinated" by something that can reduce time and space so much, it's involved even on a intellectual level, I mean computer skills are something that require a lot of mathematical, logical and analytical thought. Our brain is like challanged by technology, not only to improve but also to "hack it", I mean sometimes it's a "who mock the other first", for example sometimes it's preferred not to solve the problem, but to bypass it. But whatever... probably that is not your question.

@jaspergeli Give your definition of cruel. Anyway if two animals can reproduce themselves, like two different breeds of dogs, then, in my opinion, there is nothing cruel, it's nature. Even if a human does something about it, the only thing that I would, maybe, contest is that you shall not force two animals, same or different breed or species, it doesn't matter, to reproduce themselves.

@damncuteguy ok... We shall discuss in real time to come to a conclusion or simply to understand eachother, without putting there just opinions. So what I think is that, both on a philosophical and scientifc point of view, it's more logical to think according to the dependent origination. This reality is like an eternal circle, "nothing is created, nothing is destroyed, everything is transformed"-. If you think that in-dependant origination has more sense then you are actually assuming that there is something behind the reality, something trascendental and I will never think in such a foolish way.... Bleahhh metaphysics... That's shit

@t_hollow19 ahahahaha.... Well the actual question is: " Since when we shall consider a "baby" like a human? "-. In my opinion till the age of 2-3 it's not a human yet.

Philosophical debate about anything. You don't need to be a philosopher or know something about it, if you want to discuss something then pm. Every topic is accepted.
Languages: english, french, spanish, italian or bulgarian.

Just here to chat as well.