@sir-devil said in Depression and anti-social issues. We all need help.:
@thestrangest said in Depression and anti-social issues. We all need help.:
I said both. I actually said that atleast 2 times
Example:
WHAT is not confirmed to happen. In my 1st statement i only said "Definitely". We are definitely going to mars, curing aging, becoming able to do advanced genetic modification and what else did i say. As long as nothing horrible happens before the end of the 23rd century all of that will definitely happen
You are citing a counter-counter-argument against a counter-argument which was an argument against your statement. You can't cite something like that when we are talking about your statement; not you counter-statement. It was because I said that you said "Unlikely" in your original statement and you proceeded to deny it and now, you are saying that you said both while citing a counter-statement to my argument, which was not part of the thing we were arguing about.
Jesus fucking potato salad. I didn't say that what you stated was unlikely. You copied that from a different post than the one you were replying to because in that one i had admitted that the things you said can happen were fairly likely because you provided sources after i saud that they weren't likely along with the statement "X, Y and Z will happen aslong as nothing horribly bad would happen"
Banning government funding in the US for like 10 years, having religious leaders like the pope being against embryonic stem cell research, and still having "religious activists" working against it . Watch the fucking vids I'm not an expert on this shit
Ooh... Getting hot, are we?
Hot potato hot
If you can't keep calm during a debate why then involve in it.
The vids are plenty enough. I'm not gonna do research to explain to you something that is widely understood because i personally am not an expert on the topic but only have read critiques and condemnation in some books of how the religious have greatly harmed advancement in stem cell research. The ban on government funding by G. Bush is the thing that's cited the most as it was for purely religious reasons abd lasted around 10 years
Btw out of the three examples, only the first one has actively responsible for the underdevelopment of the research (which I have shown that religion was not the primary reason for its success)
No you ducking didn't.
During G. Bush speach whilst banning government funding
"The speech began with a description of stem cell research and the debate surrounding it. It pointed to ethical concerns pondered by scientists and by parents who want to help their children, or who want to have children; recognized widespread religious debate; and noted that there is disagreement even between people sharing the same faith. Bush described the current state of stem cell research by identifying the source of embryos preferred by scientists, namely excess embryos left over after couples attempt in vitro fertilization (IVF). Some of these extra embryos are frozen, he said, some implanted in mothers, and some donated to science for research."
https://embryo.asu.edu/pages/president-george-w-bushs-announcement-stem-cells-9-august-2001
and other two are just "Opposing" it. They are just showing their disapproval. They are not cutting funds or destroying lab.
Sure ignore them then