@Nimo24 In all honesty I think just leave him. I know that is harsh, but I highly reccomend it, don't waste your energy. He sounds like a douche.
What I mean is, he's promising you things, then cancelling last minute. On top of the cancelling, he's very adamant in saying he loves you even when he's failed you three times (correct me if I'm wrong on that, I may have misread things). I think you should run from the relationship, it's not worth your energy. He'll only emotionally drain you by leading you on like that. Virtual dating is hardly worth it, there are way better fish in the sea. From my experience as a virtual-dater, real-life relationships are much better. Do as you'd like, but I'd say drop him girlie.
Depression and anti-social issues. We all need help.
-
@thestrangest Wow! That's great news.
lazy ass
This must be an ad hominem because that statement implies that I'm not doing proper research or not giving enough materials in the argument.
-
@sir-devil said in Depression and anti-social issues. We all need help.:
@thestrangest Wow! That's great news.
lazy ass
This must be an ad hominem because that statement implies that I'm not doing proper research or not giving enough materials in the argument.
It is implying that the debate was not necessary if you had done deep enough research. Is this being used to imply that something you said is wrong? No therefore it is not an ad-hominim. If it was implying that you are wrong BECAUSE you are a "lazy-ass" meaning that you didn't do your own research then it is an ad-hominim
-
@thestrangest Where did I not do necessary research? I was the one who disapproved many of your statement with proper citation and research. Ad Hominem means using personal attacks to undermine one's argument and your statement is implying that since I didn't do the necessary research, my arguments were improper and not good, which is undermining my entire argument.
-
@sir-devil in other words if "lazy ass" is
ALWAYS
an ad-hominim (meaning attack on character" but if it isn't used to say that an argument is valid, unvalid,strong or weak then t is not AN AD-HOMINIM FALLACY -
@thestrangest You're implying that my argument was weak due to lack of proper research, aren't you?
-
@sir-devil doesn't that mean that it was a fallacy?
or better, show me where I didn't did enough research.
-
@sir-devil and btw, you are worse. You were arguing against something that even you have accepted to not have proper knowledge of.
-
@sir-devil said in Depression and anti-social issues. We all need help.:
@thestrangest Where did I not do necessary research?
I DID NOT SAY THAT YOU DID NOT DO NECESSARY RESEARCH. I said that if you could've tried to only research the topic yourself then a debate would've been unnecessary
I was the one who disapproved many of your statement with proper citation and research. Ad Hominem means using personal attacks to undermine one's argument and your statement is implying that since I didn't do the necessary research, my arguments were improper and not good, which is undermining my entire argument.
No. I said that a debate would not have needed to start if you didn't disagree, did research and did not start a debate instead of debate whilst researching stuff
-
@sir-devil said in Depression and anti-social issues. We all need help.:
@sir-devil and btw, you are worse. You were arguing against something that even you have accepted to not have proper knowledge of.
At the beginning of the debate yes but then researched to provide proper research throughout the debate
-
I said that a debate would not have needed to start if you didn't disagree, did research and did not start a debate but instead of debate whilst researching stuff
reply
-
@sir-devil No. I said that a debate would not have needed to start if you didn't disagree, did research and did not start a debate instead of debate whilst researching stuff*
-
@thestrangest I knew what I was saying in the beginning. I didn't needed to reaseach about the suicidal rates nor the condition of mars.
-
@sir-devil the but was unnecessary
-
@sir-devil said in Depression and anti-social issues. We all need help.:
@thestrangest I knew what I was saying in the beginning. I didn't needed to reaseach about the suicidal rates nor the condition of mars.
What. "I didn't needed"?
-
@thestrangest on construction
-
@sir-devil said in Depression and anti-social issues. We all need help.:
@thestrangest I knew what I was saying in the beginning. I didn't needed to reaseach about the suicidal rates nor the condition of mars.
I meant a debate on stem cell research
-
@thestrangest and did you knew about the article or the doctors who opposed it.
-
@sir-devil of course not. I read that after you told me
-
@thestrangest and if you didn't knew about it completely, why bring that up?
You were the one to bring that topic up. I didn't know much about it. What? Should I have accepted what you said, instead of doing my research to find if you are wrong? Are you suggesting that? -
@sir-devil So, you can do such things but I can't???
NIce, very nice.