Hitler killed 6 million Jews & he was a Christian. Does that mean all Christians are Killers & Terrorists?



  • @kek I welcome it. I would happily discredit him with my replies.



  • @alwaysstranger happy to hear it. I love a professional debate/conversation.



  • No not at all.
    Hitter was just a psychopath.



  • @alwaysstranger Oscar Schindler was not truly a Nazi. He masqueraded as one to help children under Nazi control. All Nazis were bad. Schindler wasn't really a Nazi.



  • @alwaysstranger I amend my statement; ALL Nazis are bad. The ones in the past and the Neo-Nazis that infest our planet today. ALL Nazis are bad.



  • If the Democratic People's Republic of Korea starves its people,and wins every football world cup(amazingly) does that mean that every democracy starves its people and wins all the time every time whatever it posts on the national broadcasting station?Im confused.Isnt North korea democratic?
    How can people believe hitler was a christian lol.
    The guy who said coscience is a jewish invention lol.along with christianity.
    The very idea that Hitler was a christian,is among the evidence that is amounting to testify to the destruction of the western mind.How can anyone believe that??
    The soviet constitution guarenteed all kinds of freedoms also LOL.

    This is from Hitler's Secret Conversations: 1941-1944
    Night of 11th-12th July, 1941:
    National Socialism and religion cannot exist together.... The heaviest blow that ever struck humanity was the coming of Christianity. Bolshevism is Christianity's illegitimate child. Both are inventions of the Jew. The deliberate lie in the matter of religion was introduced into the world by Christianity.... Let it not be said that Christianity brought man the life of the soul, for that evolution was in the natural order of things. (p 6 & 7)

    10th October, 1941, midday:
    Christianity is a rebellion against natural law, a protest against nature. Taken to its logical extreme, Christianity would mean the systematic cultivation of the human failure. (p 43)

    14th October, 1941, midday:
    The best thing is to let Christianity die a natural death.... When understanding of the universe has become widespread... Christian doctrine will be convicted of absurdity.... Christianity has reached the peak of absurdity.... And that's why someday its structure will collapse.... ...the only way to get rid of Christianity is to allow it to die little by little.... Christianity [is] the liar.... We'll see to it that the Churches cannot spread abroad teachings in conflict with the interests of the State. (p 49-52)

    19th October, 1941, night:
    The reason why the ancient world was so pure, light and serene was that it knew nothing of the two great scourges: the pox and Christianity.

    21st October, 1941, midday:
    Originally, Christianity was merely an incarnation of Bolshevism, the destroyer.... The decisive falsification of Jesus' doctrine was the work of St. Paul. He gave himself to this work... for the purposes of personal exploitation.... Didn't the world see, carried on right into the Middle Ages, the same old system of martyrs, tortures, faggots? Of old, it was in the name of Christianity. Today, it's in the name of Bolshevism. Yesterday the instigator was Saul: the instigator today, Mardochai. Saul was changed into St. Paul, and Mardochai into Karl Marx. By exterminating this pest, we shall do humanity a service of which our soldiers can have no idea. (p 63-65)

    13th December, 1941, midnight:
    Christianity is an invention of sick brains: one could imagine nothing more senseless, nor any more indecent way of turning the idea of the Godhead into a mockery.... [here he insults people who believe transubstantiation] .... When all is said, we have no reason to wish that the Italians and Spaniards should free themselves from the drug of Christianity. Let's be the only people who are immunised against the disease. (p 118 & 119)



  • he doesn't treat christianity the same, he's catholic though not interested... maybe that's why he despises jewish people cause he thought different of them 😕

    so i think its not about religion, though usually muslims got another belief that sometimes lead to terrorism, i think its kind of the person's principles/beliefs or perception

    p.s just my opinion



  • @alwaysstranger there! happy?



  • @alwaysstranger what i meant on that is terrorism/the killings 😕



  • @alwaysstranger "ALL" that's a huge statement, another aspect of bigotry bro



  • @AlwaysStranger :
    In English, there is no perfect translation, but the words used in Arabic (wa-ma) include living beings and non living beings altogether, instead of another word wa-min which refers to only non-living things. So these two verses are already pointing out that there is other life as well created in these six stages. Here are couple of other verses which further elaborates that there is indeed life in the universe.

    [30:27] And to Him belongs whosoever is in the heavens and the earth. All are obedient to Him.
    
    [37:6] Lord of the heavens and the earth and all that is between them and the Lord of the sun’s risings.
    
    [42:30] And among His Signs is the creation of the heavens and the earth, and of whatever living creatures He has spread forth in both. And He has the power to gather them together when He pleases.
    

    Note that Sun’s risings - the word used is plural of East. In our context it might be referring to other places in the universe where sun rises on some intelligent beings. Sun rising also means these planets are rotating on their axis like Earth.

    Now coming back to the original question of six stages, Personally, I believe that these verses refer not only to six stages of creation of the universe itself, but also it is dividing the creation of our particular solar system, and later life on our planet Earth also into six stages. The reason for this is some other verses which give more details of these six stages like following:

    [41:10] Say: ‘Do you really disbelieve in Him Who created the earth in two days? And do you set up equals to Him?’ That is the Lord of the worlds.
    
    [41:11] He placed therein firm mountains rising above its surface, and blessed it with abundance,and provided therein its foods in proper measure in four days — alike for all seekers.
    
    [41:12] Then He turned to the heaven while it was something like smoke, and said to it and to the earth: ‘Come ye both of you, willingly or unwillingly.’ They said, ‘We come willingly.’
    
    [41:13] So He completed them into seven heavens in two days, and He revealed to each heaven its function. And We adorned the lowest heaven with lamps for light and for protection. That is the decree of the Mighty, the All-Knowing.
    

    To me this also shows the significance of the number 6, plus a 7th and the final when creation is completed and has start performing its assigned functions or duties. This 7th stage is what the Quran refers to as He settled Himself on the Throne. You sit on a throne, or on the chair of authority and control, when your creation is ready to serve its purpose. Its a metaphorical reference.



  • This post is deleted!


  • No that is like saying all Muslims are terrorists. He is 1 out of like 100000000 christians who kill people.





  • @alwaysstranger .. and you really support some drunk made gibberish that you descended from the apes or your distance ancestors are apes .... biggest laughable joke by drunk darwin. you could try talking about other evolutionary theories but dude, Human evoution is purely nonsensical.

    By the way i will be glad to hear you out, just for fairness in my criticism, so please, i will kindly ask, how is Human evolution theory logical, rational and makes one "scientific"?



  • @alwaysstranger ,
    We do see changes within species, but we do not see any changes into other species. And, as mentioned, we see no evidence of gradual change in the fossil record either.

    Natural selection is based on circular reasoning: the fittest are those who survive, and those who survive are deemed fittest.
    "Survival of the fittest" is a conversational way to describe natural selection, but a more technical description speaks of differential rates of survival and reproduction. That is, rather than labeling species as more or less fit, one can describe how many offspring they are likely to leave under given circumstances.The key is that adaptive fitness can be defined without reference to survival: large beaks are better adapted for crushing seeds, irrespective of whether that trait has survival value under the circumstances.

    i spoke about chance : Mathematically, it is inconceivable that anything as complex as a protein, let alone a living cell or a human, could spring up by chance.
    Chance plays a part in evolution (for example, in the random mutations that can give rise to new traits), but evolution does not depend on chance to create organisms, proteins or other entities. Quite the opposite: natural selection, the principal known mechanism of evolution, harnesses nonrandom change by preserving "desirable" (adaptive) features and eliminating "undesirable" (non-adaptive) ones. As long as the forces of selection stay constant, natural selection can push evolution in one direction and produce sophisticated structures in surprisingly short times.

    i hate to continue, but serious there's a kind of intellectual gap as seen from your supposedly sitcoms with regards to discussing Human evolution. because there are some important criteria that supports evolution , but taking these criteria to a micro-level, it fails to uphold its consistency to the claim its trying to support



  • @alwaysstranger you've got a major intellectual gap and just relying on the surface part of Evolution postulates, but when faced to its micro-level, you tend to be shutoff and bring irrelevancies for sake of argument..
    Whatever dude, Human evolution is still nonsensical and that doesn't makes someone unscientific .



  • @alwaysstranger : yeah, you don't need to care much when the videos r irrelevant nd strolling out of the crux of what's been questioned. go fill up intellectually bro, there is a major gap and it's quite obvious.. it's of no significance to continue on such disparity



  • I found my answer here http://www.eabout.men/



  • so someone who is religion wise the same as someone else is part to blame for the other's actions. Sounds soo logical 😑


Log in to reply
 




By using TalkWithStranger, you are accepting our privacy and usage terms . You must be 18+ or 13+ with parental permission to use our online chatting site.