Any Space Sci Fi fans here?
Firefly, The Expanse are my favourite tv shows. Lets hope they don't cancel The Expanse after S3.
Lets talk about dinosaurs and space and shit man
lets just have deep convos
Is god real? Your thoughts
@ragnar-lothbrok said in Is god real? Your thoughts:
@alwaysstranger ok and you created your parents your grandparents and who created and so on not tell me who created the first person on the planet answer me this question who created the first person on this planet
u better ask him, stephenhawking is just a human being like us how can he prove that God doesn't exist?. matter of fact science cant prove the existence of GOD, tell him
@ragnar-lothbrok said in Is god real? Your thoughts:
@alwaysstranger said in Is god real? Your thoughts:
Yes I think god is real because how can we exist without our creator
who created god?Saying nobody created the universe isn't illogical according to science since space and time started at the big bang therefore there was no time before the big bang but saying god did it is illogical since there was no time before the big bang
Here is stephen hawking explaining why the belief in a god is unjustified/that god doesn't exist:(long version) (last 3 min of the 35 min documentary)
well,this prove nothing to me and stephen is wrong about God.
Well 93% of all other astrophysicists are also atheists. Are they all illogical and wrong too?
What stumped me the most about Hawking saying that there is no God, is that he makes a mistake that only newbie or uninformed atheists make.
USING LOGIC, IT’S IMPOSSIBLE TO PROVE THAT SOMETHING OR SOMEONE DOESN’T EXIST.
Wll after talking to you for a couple of days it seems like you're not such a big fan of logic, you're such a fucking idiot
When you talk with atheists, and you ask them to prove that there’s no God, most will tell you that it’s logically impossible to prove that God doesn’t exist.
And they are absolutely correct!
No one can prove, using logic, that something or someone that’s invisible doesn’t exist. That’s because it would require absolute knowledge.
and no one has absolute knowledge exept God him self.
1st i already debated you how stupid that "god is al knowing" thing is and you seemed to have surrendered here:
2nd let me explain to you how this works:
"Guy 1: "There is a flying a giant flying spaghetti monster that created the universe"
Guy 2: "can you prove it"
Guy 1: "No"
Guy 2: "Well i don't believe you then"
Guy 1: "why don't you believe in the flying spaghetti monster"
Guy 2: "You came up with it, why should i? Until you prove it then i won't believe it"
So Guy 1 has to prove that there's a Flying Spaghetti Monster but Guy 2 doesn't have to prove that there isn't a flying Spaghetti monster.
Now change the words "flying Spaghetti monster" with "god"
You Can’t Measure God Through Science
Science is the study of the physical and natural world.
But God, by definition, is not limited to the physical and natural world.
But you can't say that and then say "GOD effects the reality we can observe by granting prayers" (and you don't have to just talk about praying, we're talking about anything that says god influences the universe) praying doesn't work for any religion as statistics and scientific research shows, that's because all religions are wrong
In fact, God lives outside of time and space.
Therefore, a physical detection of God using scientific measurement isn’t possible.
I would agree with the statement that god exists outside space and time because that would mean that he exists in NO space and in NO time
What are you doing right now?
@how-to-make- It book 5 of a space opera right now the earth been destroyed and space has conenlies all over the solar system . It a very long story and yo ureally need to read it form the first book.
would you rather questions
@khaleezi91 said in would you rather questions:
1)would you rather have more time or more money?
Time. Time is always something i need
2)be able to see 10 mins into ur future or 10 mins in to someone sles's future?
10 min is so useless that I wouldn't care but maybe I'd go to a scratch off and see my future and get the good one
3)be able to talk with animals or speak all foreign languages?
All foreign languages because animals are useless
4)live in space or under the sea?
5)live on a house boat or in an RV?
I never lived in any of those so I'd be flattered with either one. I guess a pirate ship
Please update your passwords to strong ones
As a good security precaution make sure to choose a strong password. Which should include:
1- use more than 10 characters for ur password.
2- we all have an specific numeric shape of password in our mind, use the characters between those numbers.
3- use spaces, it increases the hours that a cracker need to crack ur account from 1 day to one year .
4- use symbols. there are symbols on ur keyboard which belongs to each numbers.
like % which is in the place of number 5 on ur keyboard. this is just a simple way for sticking them in mind.
Now You can See all of the 4 instructions in one example :
•my numeric shape that i always have in mind is: 19136574
•ill gonna store the characters now in between: 1913Tws26574
•now will use space and symbols : 1913Tws 65^%74&$
this is the most strongest password making method, even if there's a possiblity that the cracker decided to write a very strong and intelligence password.def file, it will take nearly 1 year for him to crack these kinda passwords with a supercomputer.
Being hacked and Bullied, it all Depends on you, every one deserve a high level of security, But the Question is if every one care about their borders in network ?
If your one who cares, Change it Before it takes too late.
What is the purpose of a human life?
@alwaysstranger first i'm criticizing that big-bang theory that most of atheist believes in It violates the first law of thermodynamics, which says you can't create or destroy matter or energy. Critics claim that the big bang theory suggests the universe began out of nothing. Proponents of the big bang theory say that such criticism is unwarranted for two reasons. The first is that the big bang doesn't address the creation of the universe, but rather the evolution of it. The other reason is that since the laws of science break down as you approach the creation of the universe, there's no reason to believe the first law of thermodynamics would apply.
Some critics say that the formation of stars and galaxies violates the law of entropy, which suggests systems of change become less organized over time. But if you view the early universe as completely homogeneous and isotropic, then the current universe shows signs of obeying the law of entropy.
Some astrophysicists and cosmologists argue that scientists have misinterpreted evidence like the redshift of celestial bodies and the cosmic microwave background radiation. Some cite the absence of exotic cosmic bodies that should have been the product of the big bang according to the theory.
The early inflationary period of the big bang appears to violate the rule that nothing can travel faster than the speed of light. Proponents have a few different responses to this criticism. One is that at the start of the big bang, the theory of relativity didn't apply. As a result, there was no issue with traveling faster than the speed of light. Another related response is that space itself can expand faster than the speed of light, as space falls outside the domain of the theory of gravity.