For girls tell truth .
1st Your English sucks
2nd i think if you corrected your grammar and didn't exclude guys from the question people would probably answer you
Socialism vs. Capitalism?
what do you think about that economic systems? you can argue based on culture, social, economic growth, philosophic perspectives (excluding religion).
Favorite genre of games?
First/Third person shooter excluding games involving aliens and those outer space stuff. Besides i also like strategy especially tower defense and management games
So y do u view things
I want to know y many posts can have over 300 views yet because its not about sex u will only only have 1 or two actual people talk about ur question thats excluding the 1 person who comments retarded shit
Do you think ISLAM is a religion of terrorism ?
Just yesterday was the terrorist attack in Spain... and I published this today;
After so many years of threatening the muslim world, intruding to countries and financing wars, today, the European Union fears. After so many years of complaisance on interventions, today the European Union don't know how to jolt thousand of refugees. After so many years of racism, intolerance and supremacy, of dividing countries, today, the western world fears. "They", the ones in power, condemn.
So much blood on matters which does not concern us at all. No government will ever ask the people, because its people is the indemnification on their contracts.
Do not get confuse, ever, on pointing at the muslim world as the intelectual author of terrorism. Do not think a Keffiyeh represents terrorism, do not think Allah it's the God of violence. We're all abandon in this war of imperialism that will never end.
Honestly, from here, beyond my condolences to the innocent that perished in Spain, my deepest condolences goes to the Muslim world... which will eventually get more trapped, more threatened and excluded by misinterpretation. May all of you find its voice on this world to demonstrate the amazing and wonderful people you all are.
...I guess in there i just shared what I think.
Do you think abortion should be legal or illegal? and WHY?
I feel like I too late into the game but here's my opinion.
The abortion should be allowed in the case of unconventional pregnancy (rape, incest, or if the mother's child) or if the mother's life is at stake.
Excluding that, for all the other cases there are a few of things that we must consider.
- Is the mother willing to take of taking care of the baby?
If she is unwilling, then most probably the child would grow up to be abused and unloved. In the worst case scenario, the baby would die in the early childhood. If the mother is unwilling, someone close preferably someone blood-related should be willing to take care of it. If not, the child is just going to have a hard time during its childhood which will lead to depression and other issues in its adulthood.
- Is the State capable enough to properly raise a child?
If no one is willing/capable to raise the baby, then the state should take care of it and raise it and when I say properly, it means not just throwing them together with a bunch of other kids and just give them food and education. They must be able to analyze the needs and dreams of every individual child and at least give them means to cultivate them. They must also make sure that the child doesn't feel any loneliness and isolation.
if the answer to both the questions is false, then the abortion must be allowed for the sake of the child.
@thestrangest Just wanted to say that, few things are missing their context. I ain't, bashing your statement. I just wanted to clarify. I am not going to talk about the rest. It is there. I can't say anything about it.
Although in here, it seems like the master left his servant there because she was useless, it is shown in the following verses that he left her there because he knew that she was dead and also that, he did get revenge for her by raising this crime to the entirety of Isreal.
Come on, this is one of the more common verses. Abraham will not kill his son. God stops him. I don't know how that happened. I'm just saying that it is written there.
I also wanted to add that, saying that violence is depicted in The Bible is irrelevant. Many chapters in Bible, specifically in the Old Testament are sort of like history (Don't ask me why and how god was there. I don't know). In the time period of its narration, violence is extremely common. So, yeah, of course, violence would be there.
I am not supporting Slavery or anything. I am not. I am telling again, I am not supporting slavery. Don't reply to me, saying that I endorse Slavery. Here, although it is wrong, in that time period, Slavery was practiced in almost all parts of the world. I know that they have specified some dark things, you could do with your slave and I do agree that they are bad but I just want to say that they were not uncommon at that time period. I am again, not justifying the Bible. I know that they are wrong.
I also wanted to say that they were indeed things that were homophobic but then again, it also says that except sex between two married couples, all types of sex bad.
But now, most importantly, were you "inspired" to make this long reply, just because you saw the words, "Proverbs"? I wonder if you would have ignored this topic altogether if he had excluded "Proverbs". You say that you were kind but the intention behind this reply seems obvious.
Enough is Enough! White Flag
Enough is enough, chatters. I, one of the veterans of this website, have had it.
I have had a taste of being both moderator and chatter. 6 months of attending this hell hole that I called my second home.
Yeah, I get it, the system is corrupt and a lot of moderators ban for absolute no reason.
I get that we must have our opinions, our say; and we are able to do that. Just speak up, don't let your anger boil to the point of hatred. However, our anger has become so uncontrollable, similar to the fires of Cali.
I am one of those people who has got caught up in the anger. I feel betrayed by the admin, my fellow people who I thought were my friends, but I have always thought for myself; and gone against the shit I thought wasn't right. I realized I harbored a lot of anger from the chatters I respect, and it isn't like me to get so heated. I apologize for that.
This is one of the best worst chatting websites we have, and we must stick together before it becomes a disaster. Kind of like a relationship.
I am all for people being who they are, excluding pedophiles, spammers, and extreme perverts; just...stop this.
In my 6 months of being here, this has never happened. Where one friend goes after another. We all use to insult each other and laugh about it, and now I see people taking it personally.
We all found this place, and stuck to it for our own reasons. We need to stop being so fucking irrational and get back to being drunkened pieces of shit who have fun.
I would like to also add that insulting does not do an exceptional job at making someone listen. I enjoy insulting, and being insulted as playful banter. An easy way to get where we want this website is to agree at a level, and make our voices heard. No one is the voice over ours, we are the people who make this website. We can make things happen if we wanted to. We just have gone about it wrong because we were sick and tired of the disloyalty and bullshit we were handed.
Chinese facial recognition, not funny
Did you know that China will acquire a facial recognition database for all its inhabitants, including foreign residents? When I read the "News in South China Morning Post", a tear came to my eye. But it was not a bad tear, it was a tear of sadness. And why sadness? Because of the tremendous uselessness of the system, let me explain.
As everyone knows, the Chinese are (almost) all physically similar: short, straight and shiny hair, beardles, with slanted eyes and always with a little smile on the face (attractive feature on the girls, not gonna lie). Previously, making use of the bracketed almost was to, somehow, not exclude everyone living in China who ... are not Chinese! So I evoke the Japanese, the Latins, the northern Europeans and as far as your imagination allows.
In this way, it is obvious that the accuracy rate of this equipment is nearly ninety percent, since the algorithm incorporated in this system can identify a large number of facial expressions. However, in this country only recognizes one possible face, the Chinese. As you can see, and if you're good at mathematics, the other ten percent (100-90) are Japanese, the Latins, Northern European, and again, as far as you can imagine.
On the one hand, if you are a resident of China, you look Chinese, and if for fun you remember to rob a restaurant, or hit an airport guard also equipped with this system, you and the others about 1,260 million of inhabitants will also be held accountable for your act.
On the other hand, if you are part of the other 140 million who do not have Chinese characteristics, it is here that the utility of facial recognition gains some expression. It will be very easy to for you to be identified by this system and, in a matter of seconds you can be located individually. By your distinctive nose, your skin color, your careless beard or the eye patch you wear on the right eye.
That being said, the reason why the Chinese people are a hard-working, law-abiding people is justified. Otherwise it was enough for one, just an inhabitant to flee to the treasury or divert money, to (almost) all the natives of China, to pay a fine, otherwise they would see themselves in prison.
In conclusion, it was a shame that the government invested so many millions in this technology that promised to be the solution for the particular identification of the Chinese citizen and, in the end, it turns out to be useless in this territory. It seems that the test phase took place in another country in the world where everyone was different from each other, but applying it in Chinese establishments was a big lapse.