@Leo-Ab I did I got a 90 (:
Depression and anti-social issues. We all need help.
-
@thestrangest said in Depression and anti-social issues. We all need help.:
Watch this video i already sent you:
That's the 4th(out of 4) horsemen of neo-atheism. A PhD in neurology and Bachlors in philosophy
Btw, this has no relevance in here. We are talking about Bush's speech and the reason he bans the funds.
-
THE VIDEO I JUST MENTIONED WAS MADE BEFORE THE BAN WAS LIFTED. BY A SCIENTIST. THE GUY SPEAKING IS A SCIENTIST
Not when, the ban was implemented, right? So, no relevance.
-
@thestrangest What he says is true? But why shows it as an evidence that Bush banned it due to religious reasons when it was made years after the bush's speech.
-
@sir-devil If you are not showing it as a evidence, then why to show it at all, you are just sidetracking the argument.
-
@sir-devil said in Depression and anti-social issues. We all need help.:
@thestrangest What he says is true? But why shows it as an evidence that Bush banned it due to religious reasons when it was made years after the bush's speech.
Because nothing changed in ideologies of both sides from this speach and the Bush one. DUH
-
@sir-devil the scientist in the video describes the ideologies of both sides
"It's not that we have a short time to live, but that we waste
much of it. Life is long enough, and it's been given to us in generous measure for accomplishing the greatest things, if the whole of it is well invested." - Seneca the younger(4BC-65AD)P.S. In debates, I'm second to none
I've left the site so if anyone wants to contact me(i won't always be free to talk tho), my Snapchat is thejaberom, any further questions shall be reported to willow and passed onto me
-
-
@thestrangest You can't use the ideologies discussed in his speech as an argument that Bush banned it due to religious reason,
-
@sir-devil said in Depression and anti-social issues. We all need help.:
@thestrangest What he says is true? But why shows it as an evidence that Bush banned it due to religious reasons when it was made years after the bush's speech.
Lol no. The speech of G. Bush was in 2001 and this one in 2006
-
@sir-devil said in Depression and anti-social issues. We all need help.:
@thestrangest You can't use the ideologies discussed in his speech as an argument that Bush banned it due to religious reason,
Oh but i can
"It's not that we have a short time to live, but that we waste
much of it. Life is long enough, and it's been given to us in generous measure for accomplishing the greatest things, if the whole of it is well invested." - Seneca the younger(4BC-65AD)P.S. In debates, I'm second to none
I've left the site so if anyone wants to contact me(i won't always be free to talk tho), my Snapchat is thejaberom, any further questions shall be reported to willow and passed onto me
-
@thestrangest Of course, you can but I would call it illogical.
-
@thestrangest Do you have any proper evidence or something of significance to add to this argument?
-
@sir-devil If not, I would suggest you to stop.
-
@thestrangest said in Depression and anti-social issues. We all need help.:
@sir-devil said in Depression and anti-social issues. We all need help.:
@thestrangest What he says is true? But why shows it as an evidence that Bush banned it due to religious reasons when it was made years after the bush's speech.
Lol no. The speech of G. Bush was in 2001 and this one in 2006
He even says the exact same thing in chapter 7 of his most known anti-religious book that originally got him famous and made him known as the 4th horsemen which is "the end of faith" published in 2004. 3 years after the G. Bush speach which and I'm sure the ideas in the book were the same before its publication too
"It's not that we have a short time to live, but that we waste
much of it. Life is long enough, and it's been given to us in generous measure for accomplishing the greatest things, if the whole of it is well invested." - Seneca the younger(4BC-65AD)P.S. In debates, I'm second to none
I've left the site so if anyone wants to contact me(i won't always be free to talk tho), my Snapchat is thejaberom, any further questions shall be reported to willow and passed onto me
-
@thestrangest How is this significant? Just by saying it in a book doesn't mean that Bush banned it due to religion.
-
@sir-devil You statement doesn't give anything to argue against reason behind Bush's ban.
-
@sir-devil IT IS FUCKING DESCRIBING THE IDEOLOGIES OF BOTH SIDES YOU DENSE MOTHERFUCKER. Jeez
"It's not that we have a short time to live, but that we waste
much of it. Life is long enough, and it's been given to us in generous measure for accomplishing the greatest things, if the whole of it is well invested." - Seneca the younger(4BC-65AD)P.S. In debates, I'm second to none
I've left the site so if anyone wants to contact me(i won't always be free to talk tho), my Snapchat is thejaberom, any further questions shall be reported to willow and passed onto me
-
@sir-devil it explains how the secular side answers no to the first question of "is an embryon human life" and how religious people answer it. Fuck
-
@sir-devil ARE WE OVER HERE?
"It's not that we have a short time to live, but that we waste
much of it. Life is long enough, and it's been given to us in generous measure for accomplishing the greatest things, if the whole of it is well invested." - Seneca the younger(4BC-65AD)P.S. In debates, I'm second to none
I've left the site so if anyone wants to contact me(i won't always be free to talk tho), my Snapchat is thejaberom, any further questions shall be reported to willow and passed onto me
-
IT FUCKING DESCRIBING THE IDEOLOGIES OF BOTH SIDES YOU DENSE MOTHERFUCKER. Jeez
I don't want to repeat myself. He is describing the ideology behind the religious people but doesn't describe why religion was the reason, Bush made the ban.
it explains how the secular side answers no to the first question of "is an embryon human life" and how religious people answer it. Fuck
Yeah, so. In the bush's statement, he talks about the statements given by ethicist. In here he talks about the statement given by religious people. Just because they are similar doesn't mean that they are the one and the same. If you are saying that they are, then that means you are committing a fallacy.
Btw, I don't think that he said outright that the ban was due to religious people or did he?
